From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35383: 27.0.50; Complete process of decoding Gnus group names Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 09:22:03 -0700 Message-ID: <871ry4hn4k.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <878sw1995f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfy0bv9e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sgs8z9zv.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <874l4ob2qm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhmdthjx.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87imt18d9n.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874l4k5ifs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877e9g9j48.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87a7ec3w4j.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o92qzmc5.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y31t8yso.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87v9wxy53y.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r27klhpv.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87o925z0h2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1cscns2.fsf@aia00054aia.gr> <87imrjm8kx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y30dm6m3.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="76405"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 35383@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 01 18:23:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htDrU-000JbP-NH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:23:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57508 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDrT-0000R7-Oj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDr6-0000Pn-B6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDr5-00089s-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDr4-00089n-Uj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDr4-00081F-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <878sw1995f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35383 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.156467654830755 (code B ref -1); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 16:22:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqW-0007zz-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47787) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqU-0007zs-GM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqM-0008QN-TJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:22:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqL-0007Pp-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:34848 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqK-000778-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htDqF-000Hx9-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:22:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:60FOyfx/FZe2FxnAVfxKAjc5VgU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164231 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Okay, I decided to squash into two commits: the first holding the vast >> majority of the changes (but still fairly atomic), and the second >> holding some temporary backward compatibility tomfoolery, which should >> be replaced by a proper upgrade (including an uptick to Gnus' version) >> before 27 is released. >> >> Speak now! Or... file bug reports later. > > Wow. That's a huge patch. :-) Yes it is! Though most of it is just removing calls to `gnus-group-decoded-name' and associated let bindings. The part I'm least confident about is the removal of `nnmail-group-names-not-encoded-p', since there's more filesystem interaction. > I've only... skimmed it (if you can call it that), but the main idea is > sound. As there isn't any test harness for this, really, I guess the > only way to find out whether there's any fallout from this change is to > apply it and see what breaks, and then fix that. So when it's applied > you should be on hand to quickly fix breakages over the next week or > so. :-) I haven't come up with any good method of automated testing. I've started putting "interactive" tests in the gnus-mock package, where you start up a Gnus instance and then run the tests and watch them go. I can't think of any better approach right now. I will definitely be on call for the next few weeks! Eric