From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37630: 27.0.50; image-mode-fit-frame doesn't Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:47:44 +0200 Message-ID: <871rvn2q8v.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83v9t34kxv.fsf@gnu.org> <877e5hb3yo.fsf@gnus.org> <01C6CC54-E926-470A-9736-41498FC7A25F@gnu.org> <871rvp86ks.fsf@gnus.org> <83sgo4zfnf.fsf@gnu.org> <0d475083-0f51-ed60-95f4-970fa67df241@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="76041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37630@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 17:48:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHrid-000JeU-FE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHric-0000sh-9b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriV-0000sW-E4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriU-0006bL-7N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriU-0006bH-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriU-0003ai-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37630 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37630-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37630.157054967013787 (code B ref 37630); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37630) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 15:47:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriI-0003aI-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriG-0003aB-Na for 37630@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHriD-0006s4-CO; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:47:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0d475083-0f51-ed60-95f4-970fa67df241@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:43:51 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168656 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > Looking at the code of 'image-mode-fit-frame' I can't find anything > wrong with > > (set-frame-height frame (+ (ceiling (cdr size)) > height (- inner-height))) > > and would be surprised if this failed unless some frame properties > changed in between the 'frame-height' and the 'window-inside-edges' > calls. In my experiments, this wasn't what failed. (window-inside-edges) claimed that there was one more line in the frame than there actually is (but only in --with-x-toolkit=no builds; it computes the correct height in Gtk builds). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no