From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37655: 27.0.50; reversing `gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date' does not work properly Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:04:43 -0700 Message-ID: <871rvltytw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <7ad0a3df-fba5-748a-885d-981176e1a015@topbug.net> <87woddu4t4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="21341"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37655@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Hong Xu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 09 23:26:04 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJT9-0005RQ-VA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:26:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJT8-0004Kt-Ck for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8p-0006ua-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8o-0006cQ-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8o-0006cK-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8o-0008MH-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37655.157065509432111 (code B ref 37655); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2019 21:04:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8g-0008Lq-6L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:50218 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJ8d-0008Lb-0c for 37655@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (c-73-254-86-141.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.254.86.141]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE1DCFA093; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:04:44 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Hong Xu's message of "Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:44:46 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168791 Archived-At: Hong Xu writes: > On 10/9/19 11:55 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> I can reproduce this, but oddly it only seems to have gone wrong for >> that one thread -- all the other threads in the mailbox seem to be >> sorted correctly. I also note that the Summary buffer displays the date >> of both messages in the thread as one day earlier than the Date header >> in the message itself. So I wonder if there's just something weird about >> one or both of the messages that's causing Gnus to handle the date >> incorrectly. >> When I have a bit more time I'll try to figure out what date Gnus is >> trying to use for that thread. >> > > On my personal messages, there is also only exactly one thread placed > in the wrong position. My guess is that there may be something on the > boundary not handled properly during sorting ... Ah, I guess that would make sense. Are the dates also displayed incorrectly in the Summary format line for the messages in that thread? Eric