unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, psainty@orcon.net.nz, 37875@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37875: 27.0.50; `run-with-timer' not documented in (elisp)Timers
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:37:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ruv20ej.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83pnifpwb1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:31:46 +0200")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Not really -- I wondered why there were two functions (run-with-timer
>> and run-at-time) that are identical.
>
> Because they aren't identical, see Phil's response.  run-after-delay
> was just that: it would run the function after a delay of SECS, and
> that argument isn't supposed to be anything but a number of seconds to
> wait from NOW.

I grepped through the tree -- people seem to use the two functions
interchangeably (i.e., there are calls to run-with-timer with a t value
for SECS etc).

But, OK, if you want to have two functions that are identical (only
differing in the doc string), then both functions should be documented
in the lispref manual.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-29 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22 18:38 bug#37875: 27.0.50; `run-with-timer' not documented in (elisp)Timers Phil Sainty
2019-10-23  7:01 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-10-28 15:55   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-28 17:00     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-29 11:20       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-29 11:34         ` Phil Sainty
2019-10-29 12:31         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-29 12:37           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2019-10-29 12:41             ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-29 21:22               ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871ruv20ej.fsf@gnus.org \
    --to=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=37875@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
    --cc=psainty@orcon.net.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).