From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35005: 27.0.50; Fontification unexpectedly works with anonymous faces Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 14:13:32 +0100 Message-ID: <871rur4u4j.fsf__31705.7265479647$1572614073$gmane$org@gnus.org> References: <83r2arj7rv.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8xw6d61.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="191802"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Markus Triska , 35005@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 14:14:26 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWky-000ni1-Me for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 14:14:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39126 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkx-0001NE-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkf-0001JN-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkd-0006TZ-OZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkd-0006TN-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkd-0004To-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:14:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:14:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35005.157261402517185 (code B ref 35005); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:14:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2019 13:13:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkL-0004T7-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:13:45 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWkF-0004St-T5 for 35005@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQWk9-00069n-Ez; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 14:13:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:38:38 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170603 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > AFAIK anonymous faces work fine in font-lock. They can be a bit more > delicate to us because many places that accept faces also accept lists > (either of faces or of other things) but in general there's no real > restriction that I know of. > > So I think the "do not accept" part is not true (any more?), but it's > still the case that you're generally better off using named faces > when possible. OK, I'll adjust the text in the manual. Names faces are preferable, but generating faces on the fly is sometimes necessary. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no