From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Augusto Stoffel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46469: [External] : bug#46469: 27.1; `isearch-del-char' should move point further back Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: <871rdhruuo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zh09xggr.fsf@gmail.com> <83v9axdpkm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtw9xckr.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1lke9dc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6wxw11.fsf@gmail.com> <838s7se42b.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnvbb9iq.fsf@gnu.org> <878s7rnmm8.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvapmin.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46469@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 15 20:35:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjem-0005Dk-F6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:35:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjel-0007lu-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:35:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjbK-0004xb-7i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjbG-0008AH-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:32:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjbG-0002bb-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Augusto Stoffel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46469 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46469-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46469.16134175008995 (code B ref 46469); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46469) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2021 19:31:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjau-0002Kj-Go for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:31:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:40103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjap-0002D1-T1 for 46469@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:31:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id b14so7109345eju.7 for <46469@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:31:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=p7Qm7TYph8gZT6TK3gtpE3wGmKashBBL/fsR/YSnAq4=; b=nQc/O33iypOshwU2anU8pNPEM4QPT7VYNmXGkLwos9Yx+oFcqerwH/0/2P1v1Wo8Bl re7Ntrf0hwGtyQk/UkT0qJT09zlLhGV4zYlJBMvKSeu3vMZ2B9ORvFpc/NVk9f7krA4n zjv6z3ObQbIWdY0k6Jrwfsm+okc0Os+5FQHS4WpfsFCHdLYEXyMMbfgrCubqMlLsiBf/ y8WSmKfqKkEjggBY+x+ZNFcwYSN+LWWzfDeO+W6lOHfUUeqkSQhm7ygTSJJ9t8NmfS4K gQYPAnMLrogs54uZCY2uQZFjyS9utA3niKTLt797okP6KvZrZYWRWp0fBbQl4LJydRSR T6Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=p7Qm7TYph8gZT6TK3gtpE3wGmKashBBL/fsR/YSnAq4=; b=LwFgPITomZnI3H0mkSfq8ND3/zGJEHFj6fGIXzCslmO+NIGURb+MpypAJKvKy28N6j pyLOfOLRJ0nHOzlywDdh8llAThWkCusb8UNHySqkLtE1MPF3sYJ1RFYHwy2J5XPjyqH2 xH8CS/VyJi5Zc/p3DslmhutrIE98TsAuS/emZE/2LTjSn+9UOjomR2RSbGt7tEYXBCfE BLXUBGCchbCx0iidbST54OLfNn01jgz8yIJdxzP7eDiPuGPouspEM4y3IvJZmFe9Pn+8 MxmfSru8z5tgPLkbm8Fm6ujt0MKK4omKjIT/XBYiHoCyRoqDrjDpNODNGvtBNxunf8ja FK2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pQTH2lszdgIEczpHolzcuwzDYxTkKkpR7smfTmTvegEZIrutg w5OnMX7F5rkYCXV9QgymfUrT95VzjaE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxalwjaMgYxZ1NDu72qRfJcu5Ns26fAh5JN9d+835jWQP80VWOf1NWtXS09Kh6NdijFcp7r5w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c90:: with SMTP id q16mr17759284eju.49.1613417489814; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:31:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ars3 ([2a02:908:2211:8540::16e5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kb25sm11277358ejc.19.2021.02.15.11.31.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:31:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wnvapmin.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:49:52 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200082 Archived-At: On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 19:49, Juri Linkov wrote: > I wonder why you don't use `isearch-delete-char' in this case? > It does exactly what you want - it undoes what you typed. I've used `isearch-delete-char' for years and never really got used to how it undoes a `C-s'. It's too electric for me, somehow. In any case, I can add a defcustom (or a third independent command, which would be more or less equivalent) if anyone else has interest in this. But since that doesn't seem to be case, I would rather take back my suggestion. My interest was to make Isearch a (very tiny) bit more user-friendly, but having 3 versions of delete would have the opposite effect, IMHO. I can live with the current one, even if it's suboptimal. Thanks, Augusto