From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48479: 28.0.50; Crash on `read--expression' Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 20:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: <871ra2czyk.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8635ulvbbx.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <835yzhtmt7.fsf@gnu.org> <266671C9-C9F1-4CF1-AA2C-F8D6FD64C470@acm.org> <83r1i4s2kd.fsf@gnu.org> <7D502665-A194-477F-89EF-89E617AA1109@acm.org> <83y2ccqdsw.fsf@gnu.org> <57374764-3AF7-4BC0-8376-671A067329EE@acm.org> <83tun0q9ca.fsf@gnu.org> <87cztmdbbh.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 48479@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 21:34:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRxL-0000zQ-Cv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:34:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRxK-00046O-A7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRQI-0002CF-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRQI-0004pW-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRQI-00047E-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48479.162145075115738 (code B ref 48479); Wed, 19 May 2021 19:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2021 18:59:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRPT-00045k-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRPR-00045W-Kd for 48479@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 14:59:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N+RJ91AFiWpm9hUfV54EKWCIVW0Jl4unA7gXJwsnYO4=; b=AIWf7dblqi3nAms3m0cmQg7bUV GFiQUyGPHFEOo24x8UifGIXzyyMo+eHmUE2iFo7oCDWlUqeVLgvvEEW59+4tFw4pz/h71YUTtatDm WvnD4scxK1CcXtzX/HiIqYpA9WGrATFubW6XXR/+ZaKhrkrHbcwQUsftuMs4X28o/BTc=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRPI-0007mU-FY; Wed, 19 May 2021 20:59:02 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAIVBMVEVamWNBjE5qmZ6v x5qKyIxRco+vJyXeECnLvlg0Py7///8VU2tHAAAAAWJLR0QKaND0VgAAAAlwSFlzAAALEgAACxIB 0t1+/AAAAAd0SU1FB+UFExI1KmY5K+4AAAGKSURBVDjLndRBT4MwFAfwMjW6G40nboYFk13Fw3bD pYnzZraUuZteCvsCcF1isnS34eLhfVv7WlgpI5r4lnDoj39f2wGE9JdH/gPh6JGQAWMOUIQwqi9d iLi6cN6TOAfvb4hcoL9D3fwVp/DtVAMNXINHqX8OvgWPniAVWVl8UFU4SE0P1fe6xCqoLUxw/qbH RVkI8W4h4inerX7tlJqKZ2WrFPg1pHY0K4Xc2oQFkUspAzj0wn65Bq/TQ4jPGylvpxhREK3UQs24 jNVUW4Cq3mChocjjicQCgOZ0U9PAjMu9hdVpSROTqChhbNYkhIHNcQgHghC2QNXuOK2BL+7bIGEM FUJCyJ0DqrkGVYkDIjgBy8y+m4BZFdZziX9Sbpq3YY6wOQDkZuu0ATYXgpKhuneHUFnQ9YQ7wCZ9 sIhfVAufOJAAfPNwDPqpc2G0Bjz0LrBljFDpx9SBOI7GmOhCEj9c6EgfQDNXG8jl7Cr40gfSgcSD gPck8OvgBQDnq2L6bTJvW6u182n4ARJpGLChfbD2AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA1 LTE5VDE4OjUzOjQxKzAwOjAwALJqAQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0xOVQxODo1 Mzo0MSswMDowMHHv0r0AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Men's _All The Way Through Remix EP_: "All The Way Thru (Pop Mix by Alex Suarez)" In-Reply-To: ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Wed, 19 May 2021 18:33:34 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206914 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd writes: > 19 maj 2021 kl. 16.53 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen : > >> I thought we did warn about this, but some testing now seems to indicate >> that we don't? > > (condition-case nil t nil) > > definitely elicits a warning by the byte-compiler (not about the > syntax per se but about `nil` not being a condition). Or were you > thinking about something else? I was thinking of the (condition-case nil (foo) (error)) case... (I.e., with a missing handler body.) I'm not sure whether that's supposed to or not. A handler is defined as (CONDITIONS BODY...) but a BODY in many other circumstances are allowed to be missing. Also note that (condition-case nil (foo)) doesn't give a warning. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no