From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23033: 24.5; Lock file uses the same extension as the file it's locking Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: <871r5dpeya.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8jy49fnrpl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pni3t129.fsf@marxist.se> <83eeyicxh7.fsf@gnu.org> <875zjutq51.fsf@marxist.se> <83imnta3y6.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0e19zcm.fsf@gnu.org> <878rzlqva7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 23033@debbugs.gnu.org, mgsloan@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 04:30:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxS4-00070y-0t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:30:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxS3-0006hr-42 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxQ2-0004qu-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxQ2-0008T9-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxQ2-00064R-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23033 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 23033-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23033.163253685623293 (code B ref 23033); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23033) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 02:27:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59882 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxPc-00063d-Lr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxPb-00063M-Fo for 23033@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:27:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xb6J8QW5Ili/AlVepk8Pzn6Z+ZmdOxuYdEsMWxrT/E4=; b=KiLaVdNGR2qRnYitsa1brk52Sw Df8A28mJbhj0E/wKChvAtqYY+uUWI3DcJzovsXjJjlwY4USTGtuhpSMf2GxI/DwswC1l/KgyUPsRR tI5q9zGiYuj6ea9g2p086DX1URvy/Bu/2O56X+ODUxp1oWgbdnCMun0xEDKicqOYNJ2c=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxPS-00008q-4t; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:27:28 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEXbAULfC0XfWEbY Czfxg272ubP///+I0O32AAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+UJGQIaLVwqKDUAAAG3SURBVDjL pZNNttsgDIVl0wU4TTJvBJkTlBVQeQF1Yf9beVfxH8/urHjgc/SZe4V8IfqP9ZNfRN25npQl/gsE Zf+geKp3qtnzaziBHoD961R3kpjN5LjEQDLg5DtwrHBHUegIQLxEt6vF6EScMB6J1w3cWR/6zOQS oyvqNqWx1jLW4ihVHT3RtQEjnoKDZIVMv0oF1VvB4WxWjGK3nn1uW6TzzP497GAbyd+g/g33X03x OtBrnIKdZKAGdDT0oVbVWuuf0EhdaLDGrI7eN+DkQhfreV6/t5Fc3IPuSxWb8ubh6EE/FvCEVG49 0iqETTm2QNf6iNnvgXJBP6O0Ddps6a9h2TFpyA3o+HO2WuwwvtVi5XFxyDHsW1wK/jm3NOaYELw1 CBj4bZ6HTuR2rcTJ39QM4E30Vp61HGePvAWMnQP0XVi0kCgD3iOJeJnCBqKIsBbcBETLPONs4SOU 4M06eRfx4Qrw3XtuCiG14LEsAK4ol6KBESd4xh2MJVtRP5mf74lYLwFhzGyzZdmvj5hH4c+Sw/24 VdNeXNt1twliyv4IbLol4I8fwTiHp07xe71bw1AOoD+BLwvThsXYFrzSAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNy ZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA5LTI1VDAyOjI2OjQ0KzAwOjAwLrmEGgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAy MS0wOS0yNVQwMjoyNjo0NCswMDowMF/kPKYAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Bertine Zetlitz's _Sweet Injections_: "For Fun" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:10:14 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215398 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: >> I think we should only consider adding punctuation characters, because >> that would ensure these lock files are displayed right next to the >> files they lock, like today. Moving the lock files away of the files >> they lock in the directory listing would be a disadvantage, IMO. > > I use LC_COLLATE=C, so I have never had these files next to each other, > and never missed that feature either. Yeah, they've never displayed close to each other for me, either. > I also note that even with ".lock" the files are fairly close together, > and they are also colored differently so they stand out. > > So from my perspective having the explanation ".lock" visible in the > name is worth more than a slightly better sort order. But would adding .lock to them change the sort order much? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no