From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:36:34 +0100 Message-ID: <871r13aj2l.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <83r196uqni.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftm3ye5.fsf@gnus.org> <87iluh4ety.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee55474p.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6ft46mr.fsf@gnus.org> <874k6146ay.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnt2qz9.fsf@gnus.org> <87v8yh2ot4.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1952omd.fsf@gnus.org> <831r14vq70.fsf@gnu.org> <87tue0nkrx.fsf@gmail.com> <8335lkszzc.fsf@gnu.org> <87h79zoppr.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8yfswzd.fsf@gnu.org> <874k5zdgjj.fsf@gnus.org> <87czknonef.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtjrakrf.fsf@gnus.org> <874k5zolz0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ee53ajm1.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnrn6gs.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4195"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 19 15:51:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nACJH-0000wG-8y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:51:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49514 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nACJG-0002Vx-8m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC59-0007zc-A0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC58-0000e3-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC58-00043M-4V; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.164260301215560 (code B ref 51733); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2022 14:36:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC4y-00042u-KF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36202) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC4u-00042W-2J for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:36:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4WpXpzFFSc37mB2vteqRs0fp/ZjQladA2k+r8vpksA8=; b=FmQg+2NOkQerjVk8MrRb3PrsoS rHAgSKW6kdO4qPFiRXaQPGR7M8eJRN09j1VxPelYvNYsGQ3sW9dzFOkEsj2k3YnZw/hVUX/4WOyqA kPHDz2N7x972djVH93RYPO6MW06hlL4t3TLw8KMhHB9mF9BpavSjcxGWBexQ0v8S1d6E=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAC4k-0003eM-GZ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:36:41 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEU5MEFBV5OSe3mv S0jgzsGgFi/fqD3////on9Q6AAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+YBEw4XJq4Vr58AAAGpSURB VDjLjZBRcuMwCIbJDexMD1Bh9T1jojx3VDYHWC0ncKv7H6GAZDvO5GEZjwX6gB8BoDaOo/82G6DZ ycDpAcB/gbXJExhgzT0dNR6aPIB2d+7g9Awc9Xo9Btja9hesUXff9QgjvndFSxs2vXAOoYNhBxcA HMM+915xAQxhn3tdYIDjHjXIA5wx5gMICt6YESPzZKqI7UHhDKPeMdtPq9As5vCGEZA9dOyeJzGD NXLSkFXmDjhHhTTHBlDrKG7gQoQO9DpONHfwpS6ZjgItmaREB5gceIVWZxKJoGk40UT6NY2MUxK5 wtVdooJz18hURAhsbPWp0LyOSyTXP5CvNvVESWzeT9bna6f4AdgBzdNsW+CsEgUTxHh3ELVdW8Yk 8hd7he2EpHgxk4EE6V/lip7n8vwlIoUEaq33Wpk/hBLpyT/iZqDWb+ZUVNO8A6h8T6UImbuDxeOk 05tzXzpYrLXaklI5AE0sNwc9o6YGpINKupXbEcgG6PYCqDo9gdZKtV8DkkTuUToCzSxeUZcnoJ3a vLWD0sO6nq6igLaLI+iNX4Am+EhN/RePAOvmkHezkwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0w MS0xOVQxNDoyMzozOCswMDowMPx+KhEAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDEtMTlUMTQ6 MjM6MzgrMDA6MDCNI5KtAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: The Cure's _The Top_: "Give me it" In-Reply-To: <87zgnrn6gs.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:30:27 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224601 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > Based on the message buffer I have, gnus didn=CA=BCt encode it again, so = it > must have been gmail. Of course that header was ascii-only, so why did > they encode again? RFC2047 isn't just about ASCII -- it's about a bunch of other unsafe characters, like =3D, which will trigger encoding of (naked) words that contain those characters. > What did the From: look like on the message you've just replied to? > Gnus should not have encoded it, and it contained utf-8 in the display > name. I included the From in wire format and displayed format already. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no