From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:51:34 +0100 Message-ID: <871qyod5d5.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bkxu8k7t.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87bkxu8k7t.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wngiba3j.fsf@gnu.org> <874k3m8grb.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmauwtp.fsf@gmail.com> <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfr66sb7.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6deunjj.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0ch5x8k.fsf@yahoo.com> <83h77lb6km.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35665"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , rpluim@gmail.com, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 26 17:52:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9e5-00097e-Iu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:52:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58030 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9e4-00026K-Ay for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9dy-00026B-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9dx-0000vg-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9dx-0004gb-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54562.164831350517992 (code B ref 54562); Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2022 16:51:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9dh-0004g6-BR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55364) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9df-0004fq-94 for 54562@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:51:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=slYw0Y60GiZAMnSb4fV5XkClAeqoa057sAKQ72a8Hs8=; b=KkWFPtvIUCyRCmAebjlvcOK5NL irLcVthWIdFRcgNS3IZlcP+Z1qSDpltVJzJyviRuhbHjlP+6rt1LIZhp0AHWvAfAeRHEYpOdEbW3Z dnFljXMjztjdVdCdp8xHFk9LeeuFfEW7TjscZTA5mnOIlTYW9raW10bFS+u+HFlmZ0uU=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nY9dX-0001JL-3A; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:51:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83h77lb6km.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:56:09 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228980 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > That's fine, but what is the conclusion here? Unicode defines quite a > few more COMBINING ENCLOSING codepoints, so IMO either we > do this for all of them (the entire Combining Diacritical Marks for > Symbols block), or none at all. If other applications does composition on the entire block, I guess we should do the same. I guess it's this range: 20D0..20FF; Combining Diacritical Marks for Symbols Could somebody do some testing in some other programs and see what they do? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no