Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > 3.16 Group Topics > > If you read lots and lots of groups, it might be convenient to group > them hierarchically according to topics. You put your Emacs groups over > here, your sex groups over there, and the rest (what, two groups or so?) > you put in some misc section that you never bother with anyway. You can > even group the Emacs sex groups as a sub-topic to either the Emacs > groups or the sex groups—or both! Go wild! > > I do understand the rest as well. > >> Agree. My other points remain. In particular, about joking on sex topic, >> which is present in the same paragraph. > > There are such newsgroups on the Usenet, so why would cracking jokes > about them be any different from cracking jokes about any other > newsgroup? > > Seriously, anyone who finds that joke offensive needs to grow up and get > a life! There are many who are still growing up. Is GNUS only intended for adults? I don't think so. But still that sex topic included. However, the text at the very end of the Top node of Texinfo manual is even more offensive (for many): Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. —Dick Brandon Why a few GNU manuals tend to be for adults? -- Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5 Fediverse: akib@hostux.social Codeberg: akib emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."