Felician Nemeth writes: > João Távora writes: > >>> Since it advances the status quo, can this be merged? If not, how >>> should we proceed? >> >> Haven't looked at it, but I'd say yes. However, Alan Donovan >> has replied recently, with a recipe showcasing his particular >> use case. I dont' have time to try it right now, but if you >> could try his recipe/use case with your solution, it would be >> great. > > It requires to patch and recompile gopls, which would be too much effort > for me, unfortunately. I've now followed Alan's recipe and played around a bit with this. Starting from your version, I came up with this simpler patch. I was about to push it, but let's hear your opinions first (though we can always push and tweak it later). João