From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34516: Multi-monitor frame sets Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:13:26 +0000 Message-ID: <86zhqkq1h5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pnrpjb44.fsf@gnu.org> <8736okvlv2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86sgwkawnx.fsf@gmail.com> <87imxfv519.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <865ztf73x0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ftsip36g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h8cuw7s6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5C72596F.9010707@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="94673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (windows-nt) To: 34516@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 23:16:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gy24B-000OWp-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:16:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy24A-0007jI-NZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy244-0007j8-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy243-0002b3-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy242-0002aU-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gy241-0003Yl-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34516 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.155104651213623 (code B ref -1); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2019 22:15:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gy23E-0003Xe-7J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gy23C-0003XN-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy237-00021D-Ci for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy236-0007Ye-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy235-00020K-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=57562 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy235-0001zg-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gy233-000NGg-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:15:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:hkQbDfhmawbgq9uvKGac0z6k9FE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155751 Archived-At: On Sun 24 Feb 2019, martin rudalics wrote: >>> You should always use the workarea values for displaying emacs frames. > > Much easier said than done. > >> Ok, this patch uses the workarea instead: > > AFAICT, the workarea may "move" from one display to another. So to be > on the safe side, code should always assume the presence of a workarea > even when there's none at the very moment. But I have no idea whether > the workarea size and position may change when moving from one display > to another. Please explain what you mean here with an example, as what you have written makes no sense. AndyM