From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Sebastien Vauban" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13546: 24.2.92; Error(s) when sending emails Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:43:09 +0100 Organization: Sebastien Vauban Message-ID: <86wqtt5vz6.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86ehh9mx93.fsf@somewhere.org> <86vc9winv5.fsf@somewhere.org> <86k3qcc65g.fsf@somewhere.org> <8638wzethn.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fw0z3z5e.fsf@somewhere.org> <83k3q9ubq7.fsf@gnu.org> <86k3q9l8pt.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fw0x8fos.fsf@somewhere.org> <86mwv56tid.fsf@somewhere.org> <83a9r2rdze.fsf@gnu.org> <861uc4gk5z.fsf@somewhere.org> <86wqtu3v3x.fsf@somewhere.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361997889 7684 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2013 20:44:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Wed Feb 27 21:45:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnsF-0003W7-F3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:45:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnrr-0005nE-3m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnrX-0005Zu-GI for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:44:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnrK-0006Io-0i for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnrJ-0006He-UC for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:44:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnt4-0006SM-2a for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-From: "Sebastien Vauban" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13546 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13546-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org id=B13546.136199795924810 (code B ref 13546); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13546) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2013 20:45:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnt1-0006S6-92 for submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:45:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 81-188-7-133.sdsl.easynet.be ([81.188.7.133]:46350 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAnsx-0006Rv-B2 for 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: from MUNDANEUM. (ip-83-101-44-240.customer.schedom-europe.net [83.101.44.240]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34598501199; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:44:01 +0100 (CET) X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:01:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.93 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71925 Archived-At: Eli, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org >> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:34 +0100 >> >> Regarding emacs-24 (Emacs 24.2.93), I'm using it since yesterday morning. It >> more or less causes me problems after a couple of hours. >> >> The last symptom, now, was when trying to send an email via Gnus (or should I >> say Message?). Emacs seemed inflooping, but still stopped and displayed me >> this after a while (one minute or so -- subjective appreciation): >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Emergency (alloc): Warning: past 95% of memory limit >> Memory exhausted--use C-x s then exit and restart Emacs >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Please post here all the symptoms, not just the last one. Unfortunately, I don't have other symptoms to share with you. Except if you tell me to look for some data when attaching GDB to the sick process. > We don't have much time till the next pretest (which is planned to be a > release candidate), so we must be very efficient in our communications if we > want any chance of solving this before Emacs 24.3 is released. I understand, but I don't see what I can add in this case. > Do you still maintain that pretest 24.2.91 worked fine on this same > machine with the same setup? Yes, I do. During a few days, I went back on 24.2.91, and did not see anything wrong with it. > If so, then I'm almost at the end of my wits wrt your problems. I have > reviewed all the Windows specific changes introduced between 24.2.91 and > today, and found only one that could be even remotely relevant. I have now > reverted that one change (revision 111303 on the emacs-24 branch), so please > see if the next binary behaves better. I just see there are 2 new binaries built by Dani: - emacs-24-r111300-20130225-w32-i386.zip (58.94 MB), 9 hrs ago - emacs-trunk-r111884-20130226-w32-i386.zip (59.41 MB), 7 hrs ago Damn, your change is not there. IIUC, the next build done by Dani will be in a week or so... > If not, I will have to give up on these problems until someone more talented > shows us the light. Sorry. I'm still totally convinced you're that one person! Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban