From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61183: 29.0.60; Add describe-repeat-maps to the manual Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 20:06:36 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86wn516z0z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86pmawgl17.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838rhj52en.fsf@gnu.org> <86tu07evv6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83y1pj3m4z.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmavvxze.fsf@gmail.com> <838rhi3iie.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Robert Pluim , 61183@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 19:10:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHYu-0008Vt-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 19:10:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHYa-0002Dm-QO; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHYY-0002DW-Vi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHYY-0000PX-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHYY-00069N-Gw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 18:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61183 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61183-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61183.167527495523575 (code B ref 61183); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 18:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61183) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2023 18:09:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHXm-00068B-Ma for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:09:14 -0500 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:36805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNHXl-00067w-94 for 61183@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4009F60002; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 18:09:03 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <838rhi3iie.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:07:05 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254595 Archived-At: >> How about putting something like >> >> If `repeat-mode' is enabled, these keymaps determine which single key >> can be used to repeat a command invoked via a full key sequence. >> >> in the buffer produced by `descripe-repeat-maps'? > > This text is much better, thanks. Now added to the docstring. > However, it only talks about the > keymaps, whereas the window we pop shows also some key bindings for > each keymap. The explanatory text should say something about that as > well, I think. Such an explanation would probably clarify why the > text says "single" in "single key", which currently looks "out of the > blue".