From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69237: 30.0.50; Toggle password visibility Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 16:09:13 +0200 Message-ID: <86v86cws8m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zfw0ttyp.fsf@gmx.de> <87h6i0xhbb.fsf@gmail.com> <8734tjrxt6.fsf@gmx.de> <87v86f86g8.fsf@gmail.com> <87frxgvrh4.fsf@gmx.de> <87o7c4yfzj.fsf@gmail.com> <877cisvl8s.fsf@gmx.de> <8734tgk6ql.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5881"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 69237@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 25 15:10:02 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCc-0001NJ-4k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 15:10:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCF-00064N-EX; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCD-00064B-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCD-0002Hn-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCb-0007h5-Tg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69237 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69237-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69237.170887019029544 (code B ref 69237); Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2024 14:09:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47345 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCQ-0007gR-04 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47072) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFCN-0007g7-Av for 69237@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFBs-0002Ft-WA; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:09:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=JN/7E23q5iBWML7v2puEjpeQyvGeXtW4s3rUzP+V8vQ=; b=quOz47hi/SmFpx9mf+6+ d1ebLb81c2Vc3RJCuGWcnXxyV1R52xHKWj1iXi5o0aDlgd25N72OZCTMM/Rx7WkM5F1xX6WPLkgaN FQ5xv4E4TCqkBFa8O2ONq1PcVq7ugqc1/FawR2ZEKKMeTcGEjuSaIcm87fwB/vXEDBf7s7/aIsDhw lE4BiDu+sx1SLGnws5PjPDEz2JhNQW73UOmB1tk+CAfX6xawG5aEdrUw18Q5AFut47ijtwD2yyGVs w3o9dwNOdxjGDW0QZIdeP0GaQZ3Gy7xc/u4+A3FlQ8Y77XZfG0JX/7HQuAh2BgMEHZEaoebWGY6XC 6xt2otJiBu5hmQ==; In-Reply-To: <8734tgk6ql.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec on Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:34:26 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280614 Archived-At: > Cc: 69237-done@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Kévin Le Gouguec > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:34:26 +0000 > > Michael Albinus writes: > > >> * Should we keep the double hyphen in "read-passwd--toggle-visibility"? > >> Feeling like it connotes "Emacs internals" somewhat, and wondering if > >> it's appropriate for interactive commands since they are "user-facing", > >> and users might feel discouraged from remapping "internal-looking" > >> commands. > > > > It is not intended that users call 'M-x read-passwd--toggle-visibility'. > > It makes sense only when you are already editing the minibuffer, typing > > the password. > > Right, I don't expect many users to run this command via M-x. My > thinking went more toward users who might want to do… > > (keymap-unset read-passwd-map "\t" 'remove) > (keymap-set read-passwd-map "C-c \t" 'read-passwd--toggle-visibility) > > … and who might feel uneasy about that "--" in their personal config. IMO, commands should never have two dashes in their names, because commands are never "internal", by their very definition.