From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later` Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:59:01 +0300 Message-ID: <86v84v3rka.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v84vedqt.fsf@betli.tmit.bme.hu> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8712"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 70221@debbugs.gnu.org, felician.nemeth@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 09:00:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rt02F-000257-Sa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:00:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01w-0001sm-GU; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01u-0001sb-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 02:59:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01s-0007ck-UD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 02:59:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01y-00038c-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 70221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70221.171238676111892 (code B ref 70221); Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2024 06:59:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01I-00035W-99 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 02:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt01F-00034O-IY for 70221@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 02:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt013-0007VD-Dq; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 02:59:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=hW7lgaAMhsda6SoQ/wEQEhGlY/q85dW6sS6Cz7gnw+s=; b=KbdNL2Ct19HX Ndh90E/5vqiTfvbBP8n0o8MTys3M3yzpH63qGziYyggrn/77gkqjofeL5unn7R/SWyJW01YMBtjgZ KFjMFcd2L6tz8+XyETI5bEk2ZxtP1VmOOTcY6vp6h3LmtgX/M2vsitaePwHGVTQ7+hyPdYzqLIU+K GFHCbmMlWHLQUcn5l8jztAd3eB5PgDVoEVoSgJnUNhOwtzpXhL288dV4QdnrybrlPprAm3avhw5kf EaQL4wDCh5raxdbVcbaYgeH1mSDVCOoRxohp749tc2akvs1G6oeRq5xgXJpR4ThjzKmJ5I2M6N5YW qMz8y1Rx4x52bcYvbMBB7g==; In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282745 Archived-At: > Cc: 70221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:44:05 -0400 > From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > Do this mean (run-with-timer 0 nil ...) can always be replaced with a > > more efficient (funcall-later ...)? If so, would it make sense to > > modify run-with-time as well to call funcall-later when if its first two > > argument is (0 nil)? > > No: beside the fact that they are run at slightly different times > (which might be OK), `funcall-later` doesn't return a handle you can > then use to cancel the call. This should be mentioned in the documentation.