From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75292: 31.0.50; igc: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 22:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: <86v7uvfy30.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pll5qexm.fsf@localhost> <86zfk9hxje.fsf@gnu.org> <87h66hqcqh.fsf@localhost> <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> <875xmxqa77.fsf@localhost> <86msg9hspa.fsf@gnu.org> <874j2h0wsa.fsf@localhost> <86cyh4j55c.fsf@gnu.org> <871pxjhjc1.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11420"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 03 21:22:29 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tToBg-0002ml-1l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 21:22:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToBL-0007fJ-Jm; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:22:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToBH-0007ev-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:22:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToBG-0006eW-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:22:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=oOMkGK/pd8lIEcvhwBX4YayM9ccVSsVltVvcuX4aXcs=; b=YksOgxbbjt1GbW/Kv8qG9bq4tAJqThFRWOSQ2/ppWe+c3JYh4c+4HDsDI8/nCyIJdpy4wTqB571K1Z9zJDXULzxzDzvCZB/azmxZS88moqKK3YKXPYuS6z8VJ5cUgAppmR0s8Rvt5SE8ErdBbM8PBf3x3xMmRGSJOcNV53vV3zp8tY/I+pqX51/sqpx7KHdvlz2HYAU+4vY1VNlDpo3elZb5E1wzdZhU9CHsGUMnF+8w4tmEBVKav1SkWSvA5KRu9UKBEkI5dpXJVE1L11V5te2XttS++T5hnVTfdDiLuz0Qz972XX32453gK16hjxcBslzTZLk0MedXMO/USeg0hQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tToBG-0007GL-Hi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 20:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75292.173593568127816 (code B ref 75292); Fri, 03 Jan 2025 20:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2025 20:21:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tToAb-0007EZ-Au for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:21:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tToAW-0007ED-W9 for 75292@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:21:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tToAQ-0006X3-Gv; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 15:21:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=oOMkGK/pd8lIEcvhwBX4YayM9ccVSsVltVvcuX4aXcs=; b=kpTG+At3bngN gQoN6Hm/pwQ++FGSeDQZXsBtHTIt4syKmVgfQpt5+J9ZprCzANYUft5rwfPhltRvWsJ6RpIZey880 qz3ei7F13m4SY6xK0W+P3YhxxNKrxQWp2xN1wTqYnGNf+/3WPqJH/TVA2vVbz2SynqXA3ixmgFHFu M9ny4ImAu6VzHbMHjvEgZ4i8F3zOMQDWw5VlWjWPpfYlibfXTmswxssBEoI25DmuAKBP5hR5gIgwf IH5wVeD5Bnn5P6bCgsxdmBTbfV7CKtInLCiuBwvzYedrQVBLKmMheG2z/0VLadtn3HK2Qd9HGB4wu l0wqJ1N9OiV/74O1aUVuvw==; In-Reply-To: <871pxjhjc1.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Fri, 03 Jan 2025 17:56:46 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298310 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 75292@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 17:56:46 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Ugh, then I guess you will need to modify the source, indeed, to > > change > > > > # define USABLE_POSIX_SPAWN 1 > > > > to say > > > > # define USABLE_POSIX_SPAWN 0 > > Done this morning. > After one day of usage, no errors (so far). Does this problem happen only on the igc branch, or also on master?