From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70189: [PATCH] Simple request to add '.eln' to the 'completion-ignored-extensions' list Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 10:19:31 +0300 Message-ID: <86ttkf3qm4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86v84x733f.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31136"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 70189@debbugs.gnu.org, acorallo@gnu.org To: Robert Burks , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 09:20:24 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0Lf-0007v2-Po for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:20:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0LG-0003dY-RT; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0LF-0003dO-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0LE-0004FR-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0LK-0004cC-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 70189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70189.171238799117671 (code B ref 70189); Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2024 07:19:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0L8-0004ax-Ui for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0L4-0004a7-Fl for 70189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rt0Ks-00044f-BJ; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:19:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=pKa55uXEVxcfzdLGp5weP5dch5CNbxpcmAnEr9y6J70=; b=PnR/yHoeMeRX 6RvHM+4QhqioBZ/Qkh4U5boPpKPdcrCdIjrODTlIyzWwgFQk5i4RdeqjYM01B5Z8FiMIj1FW+m1zo KS7J1aIUmLRLTG8rFF840Csy9VHW0KY6KPEfRjHLVDHZ39mqTjnb6tkfJkT/puBpROVliGEXvXz8j 6ExbWyKsxXFyJG0DpW+T2Y3ArHwSryJ2O9IlPRJKgvm/FWk1v/9HMfdTl/2HcL+ot/8jaWi9f81jj 08dJ+Ib2JVE9yi8oUq/x+oskOU9jX9MSimyYW0yKT/J6K+feNkhhkGHazYwvmEN/MJX3PWcf9u0DC C1mEF1wAAMGw8PHweE5bwQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Burks on Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:51:12 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282746 Archived-At: > From: Robert Burks > Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:51:12 -0400 > Cc: Andrea Corallo , 70189@debbugs.gnu.org > > I had some time so I went ahead and updated the bug numbers in all the patches. > Please see revised patches attached. > > 1) Revised all bug numbers to the assigned numbers. > 2) Squashed #32 from the email prior to this into #20 > 3) Fixed the wording of a comment in #11 > 4) Rebased, rebuilt, and retested on commit 64e1cfb98cb I'm confused. You originally filed no fewer than 8 separate bug reports, each one with several patches. Does this revised set replace all of them? some of them? If the latter, which ones does it replace and which ones are still relevant as originally submitted? In general, lumping together several different patches is not a good idea, especially if you opened several separate bugs for them. It makes our work of reviewing and managing these bugs much harder, especially given the fact that there are no less than 31 patches overall here with overlapping changes and issues. (We need to wait for the completion of your legal paperwork anyway.)