From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74382: `compile-first` Make rule is no longer using `load-prefer-newer` Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:09:45 +0200 Message-ID: <86serpvlba.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6bc3a410f0857c3e3433070ac19deaf7eae88c63.camel@yandex.ru> <31dfd7d1c1c19d3fff5609b86ce85c1533a84af0.camel@yandex.ru> <861pz9x45w.fsf@gnu.org> <86zflxvoux.fsf@gnu.org> <86y11hvn5r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, 74382@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 17 18:11:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tCio3-0000Tt-Rr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:11:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCing-0003wf-6D; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCine-0003wP-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCine-0004J7-ET for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:11:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=pp+mNkXj3QbmR2ZE15QDgTk70BWhQ6p6s4R0YycYlB8=; b=BQUHaJWTSmBjpMdXEmOh4FOn92EFn1wR4opbyGfr9FNcXPmLkxRYWY2gCDwg2Y7YnSIWbKyTclL4c6JhKAuKyYr8FuvJhFEvFOa0foXUsC5wZk55sNoj2WoWTF5Xn86+MPLdg4F9QyeyGIXVaDI1Ig/sePv07Ds4uA6Bb+MAtUIIZbA2IgqEgcmw9crDxZrDof+30GT/KMoq9DRwwVKKYhNom/t85wKP+4sfe4a3Z0RiN+V/h4JWr43kb8IBagSEU191ymuh33Lb0sL/rbmrN/YpGuJXVuXnChj+VPFbN4tmzyW6JAvMLRy172GgBsTlOYK/AGl1LWhaLYFa0UWeKw==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tCine-0004MS-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74382 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74382-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74382.173186340716435 (code B ref 74382); Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74382) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2024 17:10:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tCimk-0004Gv-8x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:10:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tCimh-0004DR-Jo for 74382@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCimb-0003oZ-Mf; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:09:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=pp+mNkXj3QbmR2ZE15QDgTk70BWhQ6p6s4R0YycYlB8=; b=PdoISK20E/zZtdgY8/2z Wum2HB5u6JKmQJ4+fxR1JTTGxAoeWeGEWM0BiCVw9/DBQHWRYDpDHi7j/AccljGjbDMHp83cMdDI/ fYlM4NUA+LtdswSm7derf1Fptm/XIchMC8BlUxaHKIUgR70UMqhglh1VBHuv1fizANUL19qZcAeus uEUEATQVWMbh2hpbAGPq4at5iFYFqIjwywbYSsSe9gK3/JY6PlQx8ceoi/Y4b6Z/M5c7haIwJnDM0 J6T0G1finIvS8zVB97pyAGdXadME2uSoRo0rCpRmVUCfdp62q6qpUti9w/CZ2NoO3b7+YBRMxNmpl Mpf5+5fIOH2NWA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Konstantin Kharlamov on Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:46:25 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:295549 Archived-At: > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, 74382@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:46:25 +0300 > > On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 18:29 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > We already have a special target for that: maintainer-clean.  There's > > no need to make such confusing differences between what "make clean" > > does in a tarball and in Git.  That's a standard GNU target, so it > > should do what the GNU Coding Standards say, and do it consistently. > > GNU Coding Standard section for `make clean` says, quoting: > > > Delete all files […] that are normally created by building the > program. However, don’t delete the files that record the configuration. > Also preserve files that could be made by building, but normally aren’t > because the distribution comes with them. > > The "git distribution" doesn't come with .elc files, hence .elc files > should be removed by `make clean` if run in the git repository. That's > what the standard says. There's no "Git distribution", so this doesn't apply. Once again, it is more important to me that "make clean" does the same in every case than anything else. > This "don't clean elc files during `make clean`" hurts Emacs devs and > contributors, while gaining nothing in return. I disagree. > > You will have to get used to this curiosity of the Emacs build > > system, > > sorry.  The main audience of the build stuff in Git is Emacs > > developers, so everyone else have to adapt. > > I don't think Emacs developers are using release tarballs, so this > "curiosity" isn't helping them. The curiosity is for those who build from tarballs, whoever they are.