unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 59486@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59486: completion-auto-wrap disobeyed by vertical navigation
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:30:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86pmdcw6hj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834juoydlv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:13:16 +0200")

> I don't really understand the difference between minibuffer-previous-* and
> minibuffer-previous-line-* commands (the available documentation is minimal
> and doesn't explain this difference), so it's hard to suggest an alternative.

minibuffer-previous-* are intended to navigate the completion list
horizontally while the minibuffer is active, and minibuffer-previous-line-*
vertically.

> But one immediate alternative is to use <LEFT> and <RIGHT> for
> the minibuffer-previous-* family, like previous-completion does.

<LEFT> and <RIGHT> are useful to move point in the minibuffer.
But do you think it would be okay to use <LEFT> and <RIGHT>
for navigation of completions from the minibuffer after
adding a new user option, when is non-nil (disabled by default)?





  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22 17:38 bug#59486: completion-auto-wrap disobeyed by vertical navigation Juri Linkov
2022-11-23 18:49 ` Juri Linkov
2022-11-24  7:59   ` Juri Linkov
2022-11-24  8:13     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-24 18:30       ` Juri Linkov [this message]
2022-11-24 18:43         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-25  7:47           ` Juri Linkov
2022-11-25  8:38             ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-11-28  7:56               ` Juri Linkov
2023-10-31  7:44   ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-01 17:45     ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-02  8:11       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-11-02 17:14         ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-05 17:53           ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-15 17:45             ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86pmdcw6hj.fsf@mail.linkov.net \
    --to=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=59486@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).