From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59721: 30.0.50; tab bar groups are not ordered properly Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:09:46 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86pmd4fjxh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87iliw206h.fsf@masteringemacs.org> <86o7soii72.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871qpk1jcl.fsf@masteringemacs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29108"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59721@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mickey Petersen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 18:12:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p0QdH-0007Nk-GK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:12:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qcu-0003F4-Ny; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qcs-0003EZ-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qcs-0006wt-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qcs-0007LW-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59721 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59721.166982827428224 (code B ref 59721); Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2022 17:11:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qc5-0007LA-Q4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:35957) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0Qbz-0007Ka-AI for 59721@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAE5D40006; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:10:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <871qpk1jcl.fsf@masteringemacs.org> (Mickey Petersen's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:43:21 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249534 Archived-At: > I did not check if that solves it, but this issue -- > and how I discovered it -- manifests itself when you use > `display-buffer-in-[new]-tab' and set a tab group that way. > > This can result in a large amount of distinct tab group entries for > the same tab group; does `tab-bar-tab-post-change-group-functions' > also resolve this? Your guess is right. After customizing this variable and using e.g. (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist '("buffer1" . (display-buffer-in-tab (tab-name . "C") (tab-group . "foo")))) it merges the new tab with its group. > Because just about anybody who'd use said display buffer action would > find themselves in this predicament and that variable (and > subsequently adding that function to it) is... unintuitive. So you suggest to make this value the default? Ok, the default value will be changed in the release branch.