From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73456: 31.0.50; X protocol error: RenderBadGlyph Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:07:03 +0300 Message-ID: <86plotc4e0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plotuhap.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15195"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 73456@debbugs.gnu.org To: Visuwesh , Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 24 20:08:06 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1st9xF-0003kW-MV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 20:08:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wq-0006bt-5r; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wp-0006bl-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wo-0006D7-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=SQEeS8SlgolkQDd3CY5xmdjz3PC2LBGfctvsnpTrnS4=; b=q4a0DNpQuFL71VF/Bj1Odxlf0EKkxFcG12bJIdrDeODWuT3jEX+5deKtP+KZ37wwPIMX3hI2pI0fEjO0zMXGEgfIDJ+QGV04VdPITI6SZgG+Km2h2KiFnmc++NDpv5tEN9W+EIGHZmiC+BPpQ5etq1wJK5qqyALDNiIOigA71Ctx43AEvtwTe+MEWVMS3aeSMD1W30fr78ZOuZMfESDyiHDlrOGy02DRm/6eGN2howMlZM63Lvxl4LtfkBgmGoI+QXj/Sx05gGwWECvBSpr8xn5aG4KZL8/9J5/KkuRTSXUlbZ3ICE5K7f5vAP/J/09zuclw52J/5KTPc4ebT2jaAQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st9xC-0004Vh-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73456 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 73456-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73456.172720126017289 (code B ref 73456); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 73456) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2024 18:07:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32890 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wq-0004Um-1s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wn-0004UE-NW for 73456@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1st9wJ-00067r-CE; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:07:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=SQEeS8SlgolkQDd3CY5xmdjz3PC2LBGfctvsnpTrnS4=; b=O1co0nJo+pmy bIRQ8mhkcPUd1K648phNXh+n2reFJB2Wp/aSjYYIbFKVQC6bsUgcvAC2ZnIvaKFAXWlMVWHGO36Yq DddTdqypqjQnEwq8LbYHJOSrnz4FA1auaBWfcEcX9AKUkQLXKOIO9sHyABG8dYykx0NB6c2SKmJPV +3rdKmcvhYwJfkhFmnFQMniIaWst/mvIebdsdHyC+YAy4iJdImyf+9dkRjYbll9YO+NonE/3pCImz LwZs2VouHIDPcfZFgujlnewVTPjjeExdTEr+0lBLAGZs7sfevVcOsXWnKbClGrXskg3+6Oo4S2K0X odN1HDnifFU45A/3gMxJnA==; In-Reply-To: <87plotuhap.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Visuwesh on Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:20:54 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:292357 Archived-At: > From: Visuwesh > Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:20:54 +0530 > > I am using Xfce4 4.18. When trying to focus an emacsclient frame that > was beneath Firefox, all open frames were suddenly killed. Opening a > new frame had the following in the *Messages* buffer: > > X protocol error: RenderBadGlyph (invalid Glyph parameter) on protocol request 139 > Serial no: 29516839 > Failing resource ID (if any): 0x21 > Minor code: 22 > This is a bug! Please report this to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org! > > This isn't the first time this has happened. Something similar happened > a couple of days back, and it killed Emacs with the following backtrace: > > Backtrace: > emacs(+0x199dfb)[0x55bc40b6edfb] > emacs(+0x4b22a)[0x55bc40a2022a] > emacs(+0x4b727)[0x55bc40a20727] > emacs(+0x4b72e)[0x55bc40a2072e] > emacs(+0x1983d9)[0x55bc40b6d3d9] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3f590)[0x7fda07ec1590] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x31f48)[0x7fda09829f48] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(XEventsQueued+0x1b)[0x7fda0982dd5b] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6(XtAppPending+0x6d)[0x7fda099ab82d] > emacs(+0xc3205)[0x55bc40a98205] > emacs(+0xc32ce)[0x55bc40a982ce] > emacs(+0xc4b14)[0x55bc40a99b14] > emacs(+0xc21ea)[0x55bc40a971ea] > emacs(+0x252af9)[0x55bc40c27af9] > emacs(+0x20a7a6)[0x55bc40bdf7a6] > emacs(+0x20343e)[0x55bc40bd843e] > emacs(+0x20a7a6)[0x55bc40bdf7a6] > emacs(+0x204a62)[0x55bc40bd9a62] > emacs(+0x252af9)[0x55bc40c27af9] > emacs(+0x20a7a6)[0x55bc40bdf7a6] > emacs(+0x18c6b5)[0x55bc40b616b5] > emacs(+0x206017)[0x55bc40bdb017] > emacs(+0x177bbe)[0x55bc40b4cbbe] > emacs(+0x205f71)[0x55bc40bdaf71] > emacs(+0x177b53)[0x55bc40b4cb53] > emacs(+0x17f491)[0x55bc40b54491] > emacs(+0x17f820)[0x55bc40b54820] > emacs(+0x53caa)[0x55bc40a28caa] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x29c8a)[0x7fda07eabc8a] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x85)[0x7fda07eabd45] > emacs(+0x541c1)[0x55bc40a291c1] > > This is probably not useful in any degree but I am including it in hopes > that it might hint at something. I tried running the debug build of > Emacs in hopes of catching this backtrace for some time but it was > unfruitful since this is only reproduced rarely. Thanks, but the only way to debug these problems is to run Emacs under GDB at all times, and run it in X-synchronous mode (as described in etc/DEBUG). Only then, when the rare problem happens, you will be able to collect a meaningful backtrace which will point out the offending code. Unless Po Lu has a lucky guess, of course...