From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63365: 30.0.50; GCC 13.1 breaks building Emacs with native-compilation Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 13:02:53 +0200 Message-ID: <86o7d0zbtu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86wn1jtezk.fsf@gnu.org> <83jzxjcac9.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6smopo6.fsf@gnu.org> <835y92dfgd.fsf@gnu.org> <86v8h2k475.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0rqaycc.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn1h3dpz.fsf@gnu.org> <835y91brfv.fsf@gnu.org> <86fs849xb0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ild08i8j.fsf@gnu.org> <86y1lwmfcw.fsf@gnu.org> <83ild06sb5.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5yc6m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <83jzxf5giw.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttn09r3r.fsf@gnu.org> <8634ukuf4d.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6izapkd.fsf@gnu.org> <86il38mpt5.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23269"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63365@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Arash Esbati Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 01 12:04:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUra-0005jW-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 12:04:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUrL-0006rS-PE; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUrI-0006rF-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUrI-0002DM-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUrS-0001K7-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63365 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 63365-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63365.17067854035037 (code B ref 63365); Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63365) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2024 11:03:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUqp-0001JB-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUqm-0001Iv-R0 for 63365@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUqW-00027z-U9; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:03:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=OoMlzAxtZPFFGMh1dJmffF6ZQh3j3xP7DtUY6nfTv9c=; b=Ba+mTmIakLsp aGqVJ5p8SEX98X58uviaiV7iphPndPFwZkgtLhIVnheHRRf/uy8QO2xWfsM8/WfksNuhESbKi98ZN yeiFhh2po/OZNcjhrshdmuif+0EbUrCyRPJXyWj7DSlOy8SMUHvzATxBXZPpfAl6PoLEB5E76NqDE mW0OlEyueePlwPlz2l+4XkY0qU1mET6wx4KfHGeON6iISQFIE4QAhRpPxEFisax1kEQZooaqRMTR+ y775nVgg8x2Wd7fchgWo0I6wB3b0bypt322tqgy8l442MsUDQ3RsIb1ki0C5vOruOnbow8Bd17Rxd WLW8rZg1Dpj+kInoaTPr+w==; In-Reply-To: <86il38mpt5.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Arash Esbati on Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:39:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279284 Archived-At: > From: Arash Esbati > Cc: 63365@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:39:18 +0100 > > Arash Esbati writes: > > > Ok, I will play with this and see if I can trigger the issue again; I'll > > report back. > > Here is the report. Suppose the repo is inside Z:/emacs-build-test > up-to-date with de020255a5c, I did: > > $ ./autogen.sh > $ ./configure --with-native-compilation > $ make > $ addr2line -C -f -i -p -e src/emacs.exe < lisp/emacs_backtrace.txt Does this mean the build of the master branch still crashes for you? I thought this was resolved long ago... Or do you work around this in some way? > The results are attached. HTH. Thanks. I think this means the problem with the backtrace addresses has been solved, indeed: the frames which are printed with file name and function name looks reasonable. Those which remained "??" I think are due to optimizations or something. It would be educational to see a corresponding backtrace from GDB, if you can capture it, since we will be able then to compare the "??" portions with what GDB knows about them.