From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Sergey Vinokurov <serg.foo@gmail.com>
Cc: Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>,
69953@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
Subject: bug#69953: [PATCH] Remove duplicated asserts and checks
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 09:15:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86o7b5zafb.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9378099f-76e1-45b4-8e4d-0f077cb28307@gmail.com> (message from Sergey Vinokurov on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:27:34 +0000)
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:27:34 +0000
> From: Sergey Vinokurov <serg.foo@gmail.com>
>
> I noticed that emacs-module.c contains duplicate
> module_non_local_exit_check() checks and
> module_assert_thread/module_assert_env asserts, mostly performed at the
> same point in program sequentially.
>
> The module_non_local_exit_check() checks happen in
> MODULE_HANDLE_NONLOCAL_EXIT and MODULE_FUNCTION_BEGIN_NO_CATCH macros.
> The MODULE_HANDLE_NONLOCAL_EXIT is never used by itself, only as part of
> MODULE_FUNCTION_BEGIN which starts with MODULE_FUNCTION_BEGIN_NO_CATCH
> that performs the check.
>
> In addition, there're 6 "Implementation of runtime and environment
> functions" rules outlined where MODULE_HANDLE_NONLOCAL_EXIT should be
> called at step 4 but module_non_local_exit_check() is supposed to have
> already happened at step 3 so documentation does not seem to intend for
> the check to be repeated in MODULE_HANDLE_NONLOCAL_EXIT.
>
> Regarding asserts my observation is that module_non_local_exit_check()
> already contains module_assert_thread and module_assert_env so there's
> no need to do asserts if first thing we do is call
> module_non_local_exit_check.
Thanks, but why is that a problem? module_assertions is false by
default, and the function to turn on module assertions is not even
documented in the ELisp manual. IOW, this is a debugging aid which
will rarely if at all activated, and if it is, that's on purpose by
the programmer who is investigating some tricky problem. Why is it a
problem to have too many assertions, which might help that programmer
find a bug?
I added Daniel and Philipp to the discussion, in case they have
comments to this proposal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-23 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-23 3:27 bug#69953: [PATCH] Remove duplicated asserts and checks Sergey Vinokurov
2024-03-23 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2024-03-23 12:38 ` Sergey Vinokurov
2024-04-13 7:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-04-27 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-05-09 7:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-05-09 14:16 ` Sergey Vinokurov
2024-05-11 10:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-05-11 12:12 ` Sergey Vinokurov
2024-05-11 12:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-05-11 12:57 ` Sergey Vinokurov
2024-05-11 13:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-05-11 13:11 ` Daniel Colascione
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86o7b5zafb.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=69953@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=phst@google.com \
--cc=serg.foo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).