From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Sebastien Vauban" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13546: 24.2.92; Error(s) when sending emails Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:34:50 +0100 Organization: Sebastien Vauban Message-ID: <86mwv56tid.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86ehh9mx93.fsf@somewhere.org> <861ud9gsh9.fsf@somewhere.org> <86ip5x3do6.fsf@somewhere.org> <86y5etph6t.fsf@somewhere.org> <86ip5wfv9u.fsf@somewhere.org> <86vc9winv5.fsf@somewhere.org> <86k3qcc65g.fsf@somewhere.org> <8638wzethn.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fw0z3z5e.fsf@somewhere.org> <83k3q9ubq7.fsf@gnu.org> <86k3q9l8pt.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fw0x8fos.fsf@somewhere.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360971385 11820 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2013 23:36:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sat Feb 16 00:36:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Uph-0004Hh-Nb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:36:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpN-0005Z2-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpI-0005YV-9K for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpF-0005vn-6P for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpF-0005vh-3K for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Upx-0008KP-UI for bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-From: "Sebastien Vauban" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13546 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13546-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org id=B13546.136097138331964 (code B ref 13546); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13546) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2013 23:36:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpL-0008JU-1V for submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 81-188-7-133.sdsl.easynet.be ([81.188.7.133]:38949 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6UpH-0008JM-Qd for 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:36:21 -0500 Original-Received: from MUNDANEUM. (ip-83-101-44-240.customer.schedom-europe.net [83.101.44.240]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09673500B1D; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:35:32 +0100 (CET) X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:42:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.91 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71362 Archived-At: Eli, A quick one-minute answer on what I can, not being able to test right now (and almost going to bed as well)... Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:50:27 +0100 >> Cc: 13546-ubl+/3LiMTaZdePnXv/OxA@public.gmane.org >> >> >> - emacs-24-r111270-20130215-w32-i386.zip (58.94 MB), 1 hr ago >> > >> > That one please. >> >> Check your inbox, I've sent you a screencast link (which I prefer to keep >> private, for not exposing private stuff), but please know that version does >> not work at all for my test case: >> >> - using Helm: buffers shown, locate not displayed... > > Any error messages? Anything in *Messages*? Not that I saw, no. >> - creating or opening an Org file (I wanted to test the export but couldn't >> get that far: max-lisp-eval-depth problem! > > That's got to be unrelated. Does it help to enlarge > max-lisp-eval-depth? > >> - reading my emails with Gnus: server is inaccessible > > Is that right from the start? Yes, but that could be related to a precondition to connect to my mail server: decrypting my authinfo.gpg. If that fails (or doesn't succeed), the rest won't work. > If so, can you open any other network > connection, like fetch some URL with the url-retrieve? > > Can you launch a process? E.g., does this work, if evaluated in > *scratch*? > > (setq proc (start-process-shell-command > "locate<0>" "locate-results<0>" > "locate eee")) > (sleep-for 20) > (delete-process proc) > > If you attach GDB, do you see any "warning" messages? > > I'm at a loss here... The changes don't affect any code that launches > subprocesses or open network streams. They just affect what happens > when there are no more free slots for additional subprocesses, which > should only happen once you've launched at least 32 of them. I clearly want to believe you, but did you see the live video: the difference is quite impressive between what's possible in one process and what's not in the other. > Can you show the contents of child_procs[] array, like you did before, when > you cannot see the results of 'locate'? I hope to give you more details by tomorrow. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban