From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70589: [PATCH] Refine the Custom type of generated '*-modes' options Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:29:39 +0300 Message-ID: <86mspgx9ik.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86frv8z8zc.fsf@gnu.org> <865xw4z7bn.fsf@gnu.org> <86zftgxj75.fsf@gnu.org> <86r0esxcy3.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30079"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 70589@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 26 20:30:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QLW-0007b1-Gb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:30:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QLQ-0003VM-LF; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QLO-0003QK-Ce for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QLO-0002eu-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QLf-0003xh-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:31:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:31:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 70589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70589.171415620914481 (code B ref 70589); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:31:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2024 18:30:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38421 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QKl-0003lC-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QKi-0003jS-V5 for 70589@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0QKL-0002Fm-2u; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:29:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=pKLa3IB5rBvTYEBADvnk0Cp7pQ6vyX83LyBuLiQwFRI=; b=XWSzSuFE1hrU 2u9RqeH2lecKh2+e3OeMTOTcpZUPEn/VmaBGBIFeA/U2H303RijoGQrLYeoc7dmbkPI+XrYdUUd7J iObElvhgHLLUTE8BleDQo0p1nGingmjQgwPL9YGc7MAYX0bmazX44xrqow3zfW3GSRfRdPmF4zKsr 5SJEOKliVMijW4tjn8EJ4ZUISwsytS625SgCq6oLOFmJlz5Nxs29WCIbZqxUVnIZ18rna9e6l0wqx SJn4Z1JjGPAViO3sVWmd26vhqCPtT5FqhGfDkFaHdjzjXNBNNXP2v4iFoBbYqQ4nzxOTnEGQZtaDO 5Lm5fBFZh+0KXuF541S5KA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Eshel Yaron on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:55:05 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:284007 Archived-At: > From: Eshel Yaron > Cc: 70589@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:55:05 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Thanks, but I find the likes of "By default, enable" not clear enough. > >> > Would it be accurate to say this instead: > >> > > >> > (const :tag "Enable in any other mode" t) > >> > (const :tag "Don't enable in the other modes" nil) > >> > >> That could also work, but I think this wording is a bit confusing when > >> entering the first list element (so there are no "other mode/s" yet). > >> If you think it's nevertheless preferable, I don't object. > > > > Feel free to suggest a better wording, that caters also to that > > special situation. > > Hmm, how about "Enable in all (other) modes" and "Don't enable in any > (other) mode"? Fine with me, thanks.