unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, telegraph@gmx.net, 75459@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#75459: 31.0.50; scratch-igc: Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=sig@entry=6, backtrace_limit=backtrace_limit@entry=2147483647) at ./src/emacs.c:432
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:15:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86msfz16na.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m234hrz2w8.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Gerd Möllmann on Fri, 10 Jan 2025 05:52:39 +0100)

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>,  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>   75459@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 05:52:39 +0100
> 
> Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> 
> >>> #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=sig@entry=6,
> > backtrace_limit=backtrace_limit@entry=2147483647) at ./src/emacs.c:432
> >>> #1 0x00005555555b72db in die (msg=msg@entry=0x5555559d49e0
> >> "pdl->kind == SPECPDL_BACKTRACE", file=file@entry=0x5555559d4540
> >> "eval.c", line=line@entry=118) at ./src/alloc.c:8377
> >>> #2  0x00005555555bcc21 in backtrace_function (pdl=<optimized out>) at ./src/eval.c:118
> >>> #3  0x00007fffffff986f in <function called from gdb> ()
> 
> Another thing that irritates me is that I don't see emacs_backtrace in
> the bt. Die is there, which calls terminate_due_to_signal, but then we
> are immediately in backtrace_function. That makes no sense.

I think that's because we stopped before the call to emacs_backtrace:

> Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=sig@entry=6, backtrace_limit=backtrace_limit@entry=2147483647) at ./src/emacs.c:432
> 432	{
> #0  terminate_due_to_signal (sig=sig@entry=6, backtrace_limit=backtrace_limit@entry=2147483647) at ./src/emacs.c:432
> #1  0x00005555555b72db in die (msg=msg@entry=0x5555559cedde "CHAR_TABLE_P (obj)", file=file@entry=0x5555559b0565 "character.h", line=line@entry=597) at ./src/alloc.c:8377

This happens because src/.gdbinit sets a breakpoint there:

  # When debugging, it is handy to be able to "return" from
  # terminate_due_to_signal when an assertion failure is non-fatal.
  break terminate_due_to_signal

The call to emacs_backtrace is further down in
terminate_due_to_signal.  It was not called yet.

The xbacktrace command is automatically called by GDB as a post-hook
of the "bt" (backtrace) command.  So when the functions called by GDB
to generate the Lisp backtrace crash, you see more calls to
terminate_due_to_signal, which again hit the above breakpoint.





  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-10  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09 11:19 bug#75459: 31.0.50; scratch-igc: Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=sig@entry=6, backtrace_limit=backtrace_limit@entry=2147483647) at ./src/emacs.c:432 Gregor Zattler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-09 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-01-09 14:34   ` Gerd Möllmann
2025-01-09 14:47     ` Pip Cet via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-09 15:32       ` Gregor Zattler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-09 16:14         ` Gerd Möllmann
2025-01-09 19:27           ` Pip Cet via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-09 22:29             ` Gregor Zattler via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-10  4:52             ` Gerd Möllmann
2025-01-10  7:15               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2025-01-10  7:29                 ` Gerd Möllmann
2025-01-10  7:53                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-01-10  8:14                     ` Gerd Möllmann
2025-01-10 13:46                   ` Pip Cet via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2025-01-09 14:52     ` Gerd Möllmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86msfz16na.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=75459@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=pipcet@protonmail.com \
    --cc=telegraph@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).