From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ynyaaa@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39659: 27.0.60; inappropriate han script definition in char-script-table Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:27:47 +0900 Message-ID: <86k14hu61o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86mu9g6m2m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="81456"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39659@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 20 07:29:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKi-000L41-HP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:29:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKh-0007Sy-75 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:29:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKZ-0007SC-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKY-0002BR-Km for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKY-0002BJ-HK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fKY-0000Tr-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ynyaaa@gmail.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 06:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39659 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39659-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39659.15821800841779 (code B ref 39659); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 06:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2020 06:28:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fJc-0000Sc-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:28:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:36487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fJZ-0000S5-Qv for 39659@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id gv17so438919pjb.1 for <39659@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:28:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=QLIWBR9Rcfbt6glzA0UXwEXG30cudDy8OXxYSC4TzBs=; b=to9NfIHJ0rIXPuGpcUuvLDoGh7FuGx5990K2F1lraBGcQt2g5Rl/Yvvu0ByADmNcyo zlVBK77U8rkOhyBJxJM5UY1/vl7TOE7YUg/iaNvZOvnSJ3RBSlcjxpfUsaq5Pky1V/em XyMCpKo6HUN/toK51/BLmqhIHsUYO2kXWnEumLr5apAMG3UZpwpYC00YKKQkVmK/YOF4 BfWdjPe4xW24x/nrXD+McvlSb3WX72L6HfTf96gCBCbhanywmJvqwazLug8uPDyo6ld7 5eCf3+sG4PYfQ4+ZGdZ/7PYRQDOzMdxtDJYYm98B+kvqzBI0Ezj6FyN67BmWcWbgQ+4h k46w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=QLIWBR9Rcfbt6glzA0UXwEXG30cudDy8OXxYSC4TzBs=; b=Enh/IHGnZbev+B9shgHHKv+1QOXEiRz/IlVWDpvGgmoHGskMSO5b4NZRQhZNSmANYd cgx5IAS/nEohpEX1MyiTmSFCnTOmc76EDA5/B5E2ARAUmi0Y3zyoAd7HDHhy06x4rW4I IZkZo7TVq/jAjE4wMasaBrmLN+vBUtIbtknEp97mkdHTVYm/ETSBcOW2bg84dbsgXl7V MaKCugMZR4q3e5lJ2w3rYq/AzXMSQTMEV44qVJKAElgXQMOLHzB4FVFkBzOxzmhnTk6o zk02Bt37VNcvzT1PvbjYOToBEETSCPuLeyVky6umAzHr+jfPY/JS7sVQfvLpPSJkE65f s5BQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVaixC7A415MBIEkRnr+5kPTWndkTytD0guZr78ij/6vwyG5LrN Qsf0qcItUZwnGGHgLUaIOiyq2b11 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymj1RRiRmbq66G/J+yUsLlgloEdqci+3324lPfA9Tab2IyXSyViLyBGTMj2b4+UoWPiLE8aw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4004:: with SMTP id ie4mr1771867pjb.49.1582180075702; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:27:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from HP (east42-p122.eaccess.hi-ho.ne.jp. [219.121.173.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm1810210pgd.39.2020.02.19.22.27.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:27:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83eeuqlh15.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:43:02 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176275 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: ynyaaa@gmail.com >> Cc: Kenichi Handa , 39659@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:53:07 +0900 >> >> >> It is better to set values as: >> >> 3200-33FF cjk-misc >> >> 4DC0-4DFF cjk-misc >> >> FE30-FE4F cjk-misc >> >> 1F200-1F2FF cjk-misc >> >> >> >> If enclosed CJK Ideographs should be 'han' script, >> >> enclosed Hanguls should be 'hangul' script, >> >> enclosed Katakana should be 'kana' script, >> >> and enclosed Numbers should be 'symbol' script. >> > >> > Please provide some rationale for the differences, just saying >> > "better" and "should" doesn't explain why you think the changes are >> > for the good. >> > >> > CC'ing Handa-san, who I hope will have some comments on this. >> > >> > Thanks. >> >> Because they are not han characters. >> I think that combinatorial characters are not han characters, >> and that they are symbolic characters. > > So your interpretation of cjk-misc is that they are symbols, not > letters? I'm asking because I don't really know what is meant by > "cjk-misc", I don't think we have it documented anywhere. I guess the cjk-misc script means CJK related characters. Block names in the Unicode Character Database are described as below. (https://www.unicode.org/Public/UCD/latest/ucd/Blocks.txt) 3000..303F; CJK Symbols and Punctuation 31C0..31EF; CJK Strokes 3200..32FF; Enclosed CJK Letters and Months 3300..33FF; CJK Compatibility 4DC0..4DFF; Yijing Hexagram Symbols FE30..FE4F; CJK Compatibility Forms 1F200..1F2FF; Enclosed Ideographic Supplement Yijing Hexagram Symbols(U+4DC0..U+4DFF) are chinese symbols related with 2630-2637 TRIGRAM FOR * 268A-268B MONOGRAM FOR * 268C-268F DIGRAM FOR * 1D300-1D35F Tai Xuan Jing Symbols The script symbol for "Yijing Hexagram Symbols" may be 'symbol or 'yijing-hexagram-symbol.