From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74074: 30.0.92; [NS] Frame position not reported on resize from top left Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzdgselp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y11wn4t2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 74074@debbugs.gnu.org, wyuenho@gmail.com, rudalics@gmx.at To: Robert Pluim , Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 06 14:00:37 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t8feG-0001Oa-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:00:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdl-000387-7n; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdj-00036n-MN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdj-00084s-B4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:00:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=T4axYjtaLrCIzN0BaMUY2JqtCxGxwOJFHhFQsNA2/60=; b=hnETa9dkRFQSRkVd85guvAQdkjcjjzvF71GxCfu5W22oyYtUrYSO7OA929ZIlSNMYBP0+KGym2qVf4l7PwOh9dBeNnIYw/A/1JEdi0BnS9gUfyLj4mhECiGi6ChUykTL/IgWdz/OJAXFOusajh+NrvUQA1Z9k4iDRYVpXFwddO7mMqeMbTGMjrW/u/+5jl/nvWbocaZU2M/ceelnsD5GUu9EzHIdXNdIN3EzaLlXQhduMox08F6sRWhVtyYxkrs+7mQQxZA+sRYPijCp0UWPWstLOcoVSmDWm+FEjrf2qsSvwnEKEjuKPXb9gR24z3cQ9TxjEvLeTafxVU1uvsO5qA==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdj-0006Ft-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74074.173089797623963 (code B ref 74074); Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2024 12:59:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdI-0006ER-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 07:59:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdF-0006E9-Up for 74074@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 07:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8fdA-00081a-2U; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 07:59:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=T4axYjtaLrCIzN0BaMUY2JqtCxGxwOJFHhFQsNA2/60=; b=MVAHyAp1zSFAQTjaI61R h3LwdNgBHs2qVRRxQfaMANYrM1EuFEEHnB1x/kl5/s0mmqUIEfge1U6R+XWInoouuDkC0bEp2Elor spd06vmJBVme2oEfNc8SWXvLoMPYw22V7WzYtnpdJPeH79AP+RBV4R0BarjCZS6IZSPr9aestx9Nx T5/zMIGgtHEB170xjskZbCxcSfK0tef+w7xebQQX8bR3g+M8GzQCoLVI+Q1ikBdLRYU+QZS99fZ4Q WeyKMT9oiwfM41CTRLpzDdfish702rRl7ZzEPFvb6yiNkGtcbgu7e9iSqidOm0pqiLfVDz//hbAWy 0j+obXaHMoQRuQ==; In-Reply-To: <87y11wn4t2.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:29:29 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:294955 Archived-At: > Cc: 74074@debbugs.gnu.org, martin rudalics > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 09:29:29 +0100 > > I see that under X11, the `move-frame-functions' are called when > resizing from the top left. I donʼt know what happens on MSWindows or > in a pgtk build. This comes from the MOVE_FRAME_EVENT, which is triggered on Windows as well. Not sure about PGTK, though. Maybe Po Lu knows. > A quick experiment shows that itʼs fixable on macOS, although there is > a (strong) tendency for the 'moveʼ events to get bunched up until > after the resize ends, which means they all report the same > position. But then again this happens to a lesser extent under X as > well. > > The question is: do we *want* to fix this? What are the arguments against fixing this?