From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74437: 30.0.92; completion-preview-idle-delay is delayed by flyspell Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:29:06 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzcxswbx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cyirbfpd.fsf@alternateved.com> <86bjybta3i.fsf@gnu.org> <861pz7t4yb.fsf@gnu.org> <86sermrr8i.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13657"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 74437@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@alternateved.com To: Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 17:32:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tDncv-0003Nw-8F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:32:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDncZ-00028W-CZ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDncY-000285-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDncY-000517-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:32:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=MVf1QJ+9DXrZYVngrb1Qjbw3wrUeNwWBeCddOqjKoeQ=; b=NzeFWa4/Ygc0z+J7dkinf+mVfDNeCEry+IpRILrVbU4wNqnYvbxFq0oxZB+oNVyT6WBfHfijzy7bBR7so3oaxsgc1bPjuc+qLY/CPzJXSRJTU1EK+dOpeUqNRpwEuNnAROXpv3XOrcFpY2wtWxm8rYMLuCO+PQVI4Pt/lC4UsP+RX24Magy/CarsBFLfJ8DhaqMshmyXA8LgEF37ViamGVLJOSmo7MrjVFjMtHxf82xCJ6ZYzhL9qxsMS4GJEkDKnrmX87on10fRK5DWVTynuvBK0tj9t5ywd5jKFA7CQWqR1JPwLNDM2vtKf97qrjhT5y92sdVYV9K0aLpbePO0+w==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tDncX-0004mg-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:32:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74437 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74437-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74437.173212028718341 (code B ref 74437); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74437) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2024 16:31:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tDnby-0004ll-Nn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:31:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tDnbw-0004lV-9U for 74437@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:31:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDnZl-0004EM-Hp; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:29:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=MVf1QJ+9DXrZYVngrb1Qjbw3wrUeNwWBeCddOqjKoeQ=; b=n2tesZcRwlv9 Z30zcBSlilmtOz4ZORLr/mcZ+wp9t4TavBFubntFfryb8U6TDSyZgAzt6vPJXX6WPI4rdYUiTlg9n GmlyD5PozKhjBOplzSKysF4LHw7QguxMJdMcofGh7anSbNNh1TSCNQZREVe1M5MaoHBS75fJZzv5I 4iHts3qaa0wUNZOriXmQPEZuxgx07zFR6udulbdrhhKPK46tGjN4pNtHvNzSd9UpgZwLj7p8WAOnu MLhIyOrgNBX12/JqeBys9r+LMD5Gv3Xxk/tRjNyoJvs2cBs8Q0EKPJRL9Z7jYIJGUn27lS3esdldl 6NUeFfIiQpaXcw055GPKAg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Eshel Yaron on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:52:49 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:295681 Archived-At: > From: Eshel Yaron > Cc: 74437@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@alternateved.com > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:52:49 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Eshel Yaron > >> Cc: 74437@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@alternateved.com > >> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:16:56 +0100 > > > >> > Also, what happens if there are other async > >> > subprocesses running in parallel, like maybe Grep or compilation or > >> > url-retrieve? > >> > >> They make progress, which seems to work as expected, at least with Grep. > >> That is if we use the previous patch, with the one below we pass non-nil > >> JUST-THIS-ONE argument to accept-process-output when called from a timer > >> so other processes shouldn't see new output during this call. Either > >> way works, AFAICT. > > > > The question is: what do users expect to happen in those cases? > > I don't know Neither do I. I didn't say something was wrong with either of these implementations, I'm just saying they should be well tested by users before we have enough basis to make the decisions whether the idea is generally good and whether it should probably become the default in some future version.