From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45763: 27.1; fido-mode does not work with icomplete-in-buffer completion Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:31:19 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86ilflofx4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <556652585.117858.1610281874781@office.mailbox.org> <87r1eswdp5.fsf@gmail.com> <86mt4zar3h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86a60yp5o4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36266"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 45763@debbugs.gnu.org, simon254@mailbox.org, Stefan Monnier To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 18:35:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3tA-0009G5-Cw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:35:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3sX-0005u9-DI; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3sV-0005tL-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3sV-0000Hq-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3sU-0006mz-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45763 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45763-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45763.167760566426035 (code B ref 45763); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45763) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 17:34:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51921 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3rr-0006lm-Oa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:45583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pX3ro-0006ky-VS for 45763@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41F0D24000C; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:34:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:18:08 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256997 Archived-At: > I just realized the patch shown in this bug is my own, and there's no > notice of what was done to fix this bug. Did you push my patch? Or > something else? > > When I wrote it, it didn't work, according to the message. Yes, your patch was pushed, and now it works. Sorry for the typo in my previous message. > >> I fixed in-buffer completion in the commit a7a984c0ebe. > >> Now your patch works nicely in fido-mode, > >> so I pushed it was well, thanks. > > > > If this is effectively fixing things shouldn't it be in emacs-29? > > I could backport to the emacs-29 branch if Eli agrees.