From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74750: clone-frame and make-frame pixelwise issues Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:10:37 +0200 Message-ID: <86ikrjphoy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <861pyfd8pe.fsf@gnu.org> <4d057282-8ec2-4ddb-ac0f-23e65af6e5a1@gmx.at> <7404039b-e71e-44e5-a446-70fa07889528@gmx.at> <1ed054fc-4b82-47cf-8d89-4768b56b88a7@gmx.at> <544d13ee-54f0-4786-8c5b-b1c87570f36c@gmx.at> <391ac457-09d0-4541-bc65-cddde4d23929@gmx.at> <86msgvpm8p.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 74750@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ship Mints Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 16 20:11:15 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUs-0000nC-ID for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUj-0002B1-FH; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUh-00027I-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUg-0002X2-Fq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:11:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=WTk5ZOI9Nmv6Fean2hj01h/D8teEGxCVJr1ECh1A2IE=; b=jDgso2zvbwyz5I4hrISh7DDO/FS9oGodSY3q8TFQXDBHjSDvOd9Xrh7f+t+fwTAafdO/LNoklMxjZdlCy+aSdL3QXGYpQ6byjYXiaQNia0peNwRAsm5FhGa0QSguvHZ1R8n6M9sj4I/leSOH90KEQOx8Odbfn+WvwT+yQWVJhyHub2x0078mIV3nDT2YLIvGNO3pX6h4vW5xkXyOxbbDEBDpM9bzeUaoeUtJ8cwrWCkf8xo+BXlfe5mBPRiRBbW7qhTSINtuT7eX5sGYaDvhlxK/zUwxTAOXoFJAwBiuFuFmit1ILuSaOFb7+VsuiByErnOEHTyNHZjR6dGtxZ7tFQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUg-0003ej-9j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74750.173437625614038 (code B ref 74750); Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2024 19:10:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUZ-0003eL-TO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUX-0003e5-4V for 74750@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNGUR-0002VC-JA; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:10:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WTk5ZOI9Nmv6Fean2hj01h/D8teEGxCVJr1ECh1A2IE=; b=br2LW+PX+GJC uH7BtC2x+ZCjLHGxphOtVl6ts0CRadn1rm1OuPxReIwnoKY5Kyi4vYpsKkzqWHJmXJzpFV76AtizA yKZflGpyltwtLpaYkh/Ixa9BnMx1GGL9hxLtDkGCaSPgyKeDmdXdwS+Lrp2GoS5KAoE6y/PHX3vkU +MDXTX1NaZGs2HUz8k+izzyRIIQ78VAv3vexBdiTieB6el3oYGfE9QbN+BXJWndYhnd5GnwSKHqOe DrkTlm0EctT083Xc91XmwHMFUsU2jjlyAZuOGZPRf9VdgDkHX8DTZVcDV4hqWwasBd2neuIZy6OpP eSP+S5fL5unU5a5lJv5MUQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Ship Mints on Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:51:14 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:297215 Archived-At: > From: Ship Mints > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:51:14 -0500 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 74750@debbugs.gnu.org > > The tty test you're asking about was already in place, I merely added the missing frame argument that > ensures the test is against the source frame rather than the ambient selected-frame. As to its utility, I can go > only by the docstring sentence that reads "If the terminal is a text-only terminal then also select the new > frame." Seems to have originated with this commit 2c662e6d66165db8ead2f4d19a61af521807b8ba in 2021 > when clone-frame was introduced. Martin, do we want to remove the condition? I dislike such differences if they are not really necessary. I understand why in the TTY case we must select the frame, but I don't understand why we refrain from doing so in the GUI case. WDYT?