From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75292: 31.0.50; igc: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:35:06 +0200 Message-ID: <86ikqxhs3p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pll5qexm.fsf@localhost> <86zfk9hxje.fsf@gnu.org> <87h66hqcqh.fsf@localhost> <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> <6f1070fd-b2c8-47c6-a8b8-26325d620cb4@cs.ucla.edu> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27276"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92@posteo.net To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 21:36:11 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRvO-0006xL-QC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 21:36:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRvJ-0004QD-AV; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRvG-0004Po-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRvG-0004f6-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:36:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=KoAcrFkUpOp/HSAQ9++aN5IVvkyJDEiD+k+5851Li9s=; b=npnFIdKRt0+Vb6fqaM0esKEBxvBbi78BF4sgadB7oPcmeWqeK4BWK+d5eD42FtOJejwhAKQGTBQiUjLzcRcTjuPfACm1scOkt8mJ9SP9TsRzsWN056N9ojkn202dL79W7tBNUA795wJPMTHwyUPxIhbJzdnVhFlTmbH3/OTDFq0KFAwdtxghoUxTMRFuWso+EOgfGE4lTTjLbAQBTsJ2B9IA4TU64hoJJvmRmVHzK9H3/iXIFjpCvAGLq8vS6XMF+aYWn1rTU9b52N63HEYEFAvBg3/+hFZmshofpr3SwItT/EqPhnE5sFzqWDLadoDPtvlonkS8lxYSzgidINkeow==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRvF-00078L-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75292.173585012327337 (code B ref 75292); Thu, 02 Jan 2025 20:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 20:35:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46890 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRuZ-00076j-Cr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:35:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55014) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRuX-00076N-IY for 75292@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:35:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTRuR-0004ZY-SJ; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:35:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KoAcrFkUpOp/HSAQ9++aN5IVvkyJDEiD+k+5851Li9s=; b=G9uaS/mowyq6 cpJmB9bhAaiMZFfs+Uh7Y7h8RG8SdM1+mWXpDdStPr//tRlzstzxTuLXHc82MriG4gN9J51YaI5ce 4Rd+EVYlXUNZpthIOgBfTd+m9K/Ho0yNOnvQ/UT+FORHSzqqNnwIxBXQFZfLqTUm8qLHDwfdIc5hp a+bRYXcqSpNsre7BMozN2sckS0giUl6+ofkJWGZFrljbezBxvoeXKHwg0Uo2lqxKUDmgdquXUxJVs G/iqiDBYf0u6/syqzLQqRogJ9Q+0VPHiSbNp8ZYuLC37r2hlcsTtEewKSBA+PAoH3hOtyUkvO4Abv sxZ96LKrUkg62Cc1uWX46w==; In-Reply-To: <6f1070fd-b2c8-47c6-a8b8-26325d620cb4@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:29 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298235 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:41:29 -0800 > Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > > On 2025-01-02 11:29, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") > >>>> (call-process-shell-command "grep -anE '^:(Sourc.URL\\+?):[ \11[]+https://curiouscoding\\.nl/posts/static-search-tree/[]]*$' '/home/yantar92/Org/rss_archive_2019.org'" nil t) > ... > > Could it be that this started happening when we began using > > posix_spawn instead of vfork? > > If Emacs uses posix_spawn instead of vfork, shouldn't file-error report > "Doing posix_spawn" instead of "Doing vfork"? Truth in advertising and > all that.... We should, but it looks like someone didn't want to condition the value of CHILD_SETUP_ERROR_DESC by USABLE_POSIX_SPAWN...