From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kazuhiro Ito Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37556: gpg "-unknown" version string Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 23:59:20 +0900 Message-ID: <86h84so6k7.wl--xmue@d1.dion.ne.jp> References: <87sgoel53e.fsf@gnus.org> <837e5qdzim.fsf@gnu.org> <85imp9kgj1.fsf@gmail.com> <875zl9dewa.fsf@gnus.org> <85ftkdkfjv.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgoc8y67.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="194487"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?Q?Goj=C5=8D?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.0 (x86_64-w64-mingw32) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Noam Postavsky , 37556@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 01 18:06:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFKf4-000oMM-V5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:06:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFKf2-0004V3-Hr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJdI-0003g9-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJdD-00031Z-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJdD-000318-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJdC-0001Ln-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kazuhiro Ito Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37556.15699419705109 (code B ref 37556); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2019 14:59:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJcg-0001KK-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from snd00001.auone-net.jp ([111.86.247.1]:38915 helo=dmta0007.auone-net.jp) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJcc-0001K4-4b for 37556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from kzhr.d1.dion.ne.jp by dmta0007.auone-net.jp with ESMTP id <20191001145922804.JFLJ.13377.kzhr.d1.dion.ne.jp@dmta0007.auone-net.jp>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:59:22 +0900 Original-Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs In-Reply-To: <87sgoc8y67.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:03:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168035 Archived-At: > >>> I don't understand why making -unknown equivalent to a lesser version > >>> makes sense. Shouldn't 2.2.17 and 2.2.17-unknown in fact be equal? > >> > >> Should they? 2.2.17-pre and 2.2.17-alpha should be less than 2.2.17, > >> but how do we know that -unknown isn't something -alpha-ish? > > > > It's "unknown", so it could be something opposite-of-alpha-ish too, > > right? On average, 0 seems right. > > That's possible. Does anybody know how usual these -unknown things are, > and why they exist? I don't know "why", but I described when the suffix was added in the past post. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35629#11 > GnuPG's autogen.sh makes "-unknown" suffix version configure script if > source code directory doesn't have .git directory. If you have the repository, autogen.sh can set an apropriate revision number. I guess "-unknown" version means "unknown version" literally, because they couldn't decide the source code revision without repository. -- Kazuhiro Ito