From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74750: clone-frame and make-frame pixelwise issues Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:34:46 +0200 Message-ID: <86h672o2kp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7404039b-e71e-44e5-a446-70fa07889528@gmx.at> <1ed054fc-4b82-47cf-8d89-4768b56b88a7@gmx.at> <544d13ee-54f0-4786-8c5b-b1c87570f36c@gmx.at> <391ac457-09d0-4541-bc65-cddde4d23929@gmx.at> <86msgvpm8p.fsf@gnu.org> <86ikrjphoy.fsf@gnu.org> <2d934c65-6cf5-4e6f-8dc4-5494433b27d0@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21797"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 74750@debbugs.gnu.org, shipmints@gmail.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 14:36:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXkD-0005Rl-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:36:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXk5-0006i1-KU; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXk3-0006fy-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXk3-0004ZP-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:36:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=C2xpsKWWrRncTiu1p/tTDnWTZdRS5tqEJn2VGu+t7vQ=; b=vMvGlJ/C9vUGS6vog8eVTftKE5sdmmiI+sIZq6j5aa+TTaxhRXkNCVtnA2RmDBE32YhgbeWGU1mtplLhgClVjRLe1b/W3Ah5HtA2qf1+5hOnZEKqAeMR/Qa2tC+Kmkm1zeCtsxRbtzEsVDyetfm5EFvtQ+fHfPiiDg8p62G/BIhjCv8YYh0yoqMN4/bHplt4pyuoesG91QQSW9BJWx3CdjGXDrqsZyo1oW5Y4gcAQFoL9Ss+tjtPErYio71PRu0vsYz4JW7cF3nq2UOLNokNa8ocsrSNmAXjQjCU1KrNXYpDQP6h8w+AAHXmomOzKZ8CBtvFXEbYo3wCjVUQ9PofWQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXk2-0008Np-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74750.173444250631773 (code B ref 74750); Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2024 13:35:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXj7-0008GP-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXj3-0008Fi-QM for 74750@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXir-0004G3-5Y; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:34:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=C2xpsKWWrRncTiu1p/tTDnWTZdRS5tqEJn2VGu+t7vQ=; b=o1njvBDwA4+O BJfXshIUAw2PBFVsil51qqhrhbR8qetrj5aj12LfwXq0qjSDOjpsFX9XsOs5kPAEEwA5sWwnP5iVF Em+7BIXtWLHsxqecztfNzycktwJHJE1bRYNoSmHRzxRf5aKtoUtEnfmq2PJl8/l588IDzUeW588hC 63WBrMNy8kItb0AqATbFtU5ySaTUUkvHyS2Qsnwyv2jjpCbW544b2KikkddpzW9r4I+4czlWlE47I LQnbeB4bVHR1URNfs+GgSfOgoG61035cQPgAj1hX/50iSaXiYwwbnjP2PRp705nY/MEGjIfR4Wyzh 0ee+k/9YTFYoN6th4YYerw==; In-Reply-To: <2d934c65-6cf5-4e6f-8dc4-5494433b27d0@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:02:13 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:297292 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:02:13 +0100 > Cc: 74750@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > > > Martin, do we want to remove the condition? I dislike such > > differences if they are not really necessary. I understand why in the > > TTY case we must select the frame, but I don't understand why we > > refrain from doing so in the GUI case. > > Shouldn't we have decided that at the time 'clone-frame' was proposed? > Nowadays people might want to keep the selected frame alone; in > particular if FRAME is not the selected frame. It would make no > difference here since 'make-frame' will automatically select the clone > and give it input focus. I see your point. So let's leave that aspect alone.