From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:51:51 +0300 Message-ID: <86frtk6kfs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5c493f86-0af5-256f-41a7-7d886ab4c5e4@gutov.dev> <83ledanvzw.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0n2m7qz.fsf@gnu.org> <26afa109-9ba3-78a3-0e68-7585ae8e3a19@gutov.dev> <83il8dna30.fsf@gnu.org> <83bke5mhvs.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5tmk79p.fsf@gnu.org> <937d9927-506f-aa36-94e9-3cceb8f629dd@gutov.dev> <83zg1hay6q.fsf@gnu.org> <451d6012-e5ab-df6c-50e3-dac20b91781c@gutov.dev> <83led09dlk.fsf@gnu.org> <1d43341a-2e7c-9f1d-68e9-9bac6f4b5fba@gutov.dev> <838r8w3zr2.fsf@gnu.org> <868qzwwoif.fsf@gnu.org> <86o78bd473.fsf@gnu.org> <15f746d0-e635-47a0-a613-2ea31523966a@gutov.dev> <5922967c-1a6e-4b6e-b299-37fb598e5eca@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 22:43:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8Kn-0004l9-6c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 22:43:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8Js-0004by-3E; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:42:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8Jl-0004XC-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8Jl-00083e-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8Jj-0006NP-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:42:07 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 20:42:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D66020.171813850024235 (code D ref 66020); Tue, 11 Jun 2024 20:42:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66020-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2024 20:41:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH8JH-0006Ii-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:41:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH82P-0002i3-W1 for 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGvMH-0001mx-DV; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:51:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=MMRQqHnyyczCfcyqKXzFr6d4hRNtdS/yS3nr2FXS7pE=; b=MPtFZea/UMyO qjqC6qK5h+eyiCIktONpsaMY5ARlqR36KxVngSEBF4xTA+6PRo2gxDBnl05uUgiRduR1uutJ2TEC7 YHD1eKMCYk4bgP+1gcXIHhgGc1vAcxhAWBA/U25lfLZ5vctuv8jVPqdEuggQTNgU3b2x6n4MACbnh u2B5030thlCH/Dzwk+H2tMdROgmEdXwjUCJny0vSEhOgZmLpfBQURz2ID6cjts347b12I4VcwHw3K m0pT+9pZv8yJ6byhUVQKHjDprqrKXpExOibZ++kBpkK8f3WAfQTCQk2PHs0y3e8yupGyDCJoagir7 Hoqa475s9v6AhDw/weQ7RA==; In-Reply-To: <5922967c-1a6e-4b6e-b299-37fb598e5eca@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:12:21 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287128 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:12:21 +0300 > From: Dmitry Gutov > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > Is it okay to make adjust_markers_for_insert non-static and call it > here? See attached. Technically, this is okay, but I'd like to hear from Stefan about whether it's correct to insert process output before the markers.