From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 19:19:16 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86edfv9tuz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87o7f3e4cb.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <83wmtr2mye.fsf@gnu.org> <87lea3wpai.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <8334wby0bq.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1e3wia7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sf4buzpc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27014"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 67661@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Eshel Yaron , 67001@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 18:24:03 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rC13b-0006rH-9S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 18:24:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC13O-0006Tt-VK; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC13O-0006Tf-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC13N-0000UH-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rC13b-0000Xs-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:24:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:24:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67661.17021426002031 (code B ref 67661); Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:24:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2023 17:23:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rC12u-0000Wb-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:48317) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rC12n-0000Vq-KR; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3020C1BF203; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 17:22:51 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87sf4buzpc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> (Sean Whitton's message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2023 16:07:27 +0000") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:275869 Archived-At: >> I was referring to the specific case that Sean's recipe illustrated. >> This case exhibits a change in behavior that you clearly described, and >> that change is supposedly for the worse. IIUC what bothers Sean is that >> both interfaces appear together, but the thing is that that seems to be >> inherent to how `icomplete-in-buffer` currently works. > > No, what bothers me is the regression as described by Eli. By definition a regression is a bug where a feature that has worked before stops working. As you noted, icomplete-in-buffer didn't work for years, until I fixed it for Emacs 29 (as least brought it to a usable state). The test case that you described shows its effect only by accident, until Eshel improved the related behavior of completion-in-region-mode, so that now icomplete-in-buffer works consistently when it enables both at the same time: in-buffer completions and in *Completions*. So instead of trying to restore an arbitrary behavior at the moment just after icomplete-in-buffer became usable, it would be much more useful to invest energy to deciding how better to finish this feature.