From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69738: [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:57:25 +0200 Message-ID: <86edc42c96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4a0215b2e7bb416cf352e867183f745a@posteo.net> <86plvztv14.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14297"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69738-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: rameiko87@posteo.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 21 09:58:42 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEG1-0003WT-VF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:58:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEFk-0001eS-45; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEFi-0001dz-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEFi-0004vC-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEGM-00040d-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:59:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 69738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, rameiko87@posteo.net Original-Received: via spool by 69738-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D69738.171101149715351 (code D ref 69738); Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69738-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2024 08:58:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEFc-0003zW-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33086) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEFb-0003zK-C6 for 69738-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnEEs-0004pi-57; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 04:57:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=aPtiDYDedPPsACxZr3Ym1JNRWxz4okZhEq9DJyGFDtw=; b=SFEuzPFChXav 1QayuSFsZXxaXnGC3I8mRspKAhHf/R2a+/ascxaHIa4aUf+x+XpChmwrP9in5C0MaApGFxS1VqI/k G739yYFQSk4qxHVr8Ad4f3w+eHAcD6k+nsMEP9arQxUG3G0bt+zM8ksYPbOqvF2V5YKjiByg33UvA Y3Gs7w8e0O//acS+cc41MDj4Xg4yev24oUKFPYEgP1ly7eZgq1DjePsqprfvfHw1sxVBIjMsR7zYD R/0o9ml9rzCTOFyWZOPR0MR1cKNjETV1p+26/O6TgmnqGhlJjigj0YDCfl9Hwq9TwfNG39OzokBk5 O2/8OS+spA82PlL0Ftdl+w==; In-Reply-To: <86plvztv14.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:54:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281887 Archived-At: > Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:54:47 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:49:54 +0000 > > From: rameiko87@posteo.net > > > > For brevity I don't include the steps for C-c nor for C-s but only for > > C-d and C-k; but I can assure you that the case of C-c would yield the > > same result; I wonder what the desired result would be for C-s instead. > > > > Steps to reproduce: > > > > emacs -Q -nw > > M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t) > > M-x rmail > > m > > C-c C-d > > > > alternatively, use C-c C-k on the last line. > > > > Expected result: > > The frame is deleted (as the manual specifies at the end of 34.10). > > > > Actual result: > > The frame is not deleted. > > It's a documentation bug: that frame is deleted only if certain > conditions are met. One of those conditions is that there are > visible frames on display besides the frame where the message was > composed. In the -nw session, that condition is not met. See > rmail-mail-return for more details about what is actually being done > in each case. > > IOW: this is a feature, and (IMO) a reasonable one at that, it just > needs a better documentation. I've now made the documentation more accurate (on the emacs-29 branch), and I'm therefore closing this bug.