From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73752: 29.4; Ligatures are randomly rendered with extra spaces Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 20:57:10 +0200 Message-ID: <86cyjh4dx5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91cb4d5a6c979bf096ca9fa26711395ab29b941b.camel@timruffing.de> <86wmhp4obi.fsf@gnu.org> <86msil4mpn.fsf@gnu.org> <8f02b0490d2abb0889b760fb80c3ec492c63c784.camel@timruffing.de> <86ed3x4h7m.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4910"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 73752@debbugs.gnu.org, xuan@xlk.me, visuweshm@gmail.com To: Tim Ruffing Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 19:58:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Dtj-000136-8i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:58:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6DtN-0000zo-1P; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6DtL-0000zH-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6DtK-0005fv-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:58:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=AXqFVQwdvGWZzCWCtObNmG/Jygx797/41ZJprTImjjw=; b=q3chcdz4MyJO86mY/scKPCEcP699Ii42d+bnfZ/pjk1titBBB4fo0dtxi28iQQEEUdZasYlxzkza6bXnwVBoC85Y4WTczaTW9UxwoCkU3aWOlmhlwZRYlv3cBOi07W2TITiFS/qACsX8XPBj0P/aO3YllK0AnIN5oVkRlHjhkW6qkJj8INQX3ywpdjoZiBn66s7GpUkpLKxTeqsYXSmzKUc/Rg+Wpyn2jy97oqV3q56vNT/ugs/YFPOBpG97fluHAnASCyVEo9+TpJ+vubBiHfz2bPLpfKvxIwXdGujnvISCYYF08dSsfD2DJHdcD2jTbUOY5or2G8VFpgBhJnxwng==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6DtK-0004uw-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73752 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 73752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73752.173031465218730 (code B ref 73752); Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 73752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2024 18:57:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Dsp-0004rp-IE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Dsk-0004qi-4c for 73752@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t6Dsd-0005cv-MD; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:57:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=AXqFVQwdvGWZzCWCtObNmG/Jygx797/41ZJprTImjjw=; b=QgHIXckql2i9 UY48i3jEdObHiTl/707ZxHB02oXVuWLe5Lsr8DN0BjZ8A3LeHjft/2LEre6rGQRC7sHh9a7mouMgj P8+Gw34DEkMYYuv4Ia0j64JRKZuyWATwcR8d8GQ+Ph5pmC3vDNBeG4El5fYYkMLThfwCq4Z/fPy81 f3LCIr6eIWWUg9wHyoTHx6nSZQbQPV/Xq0acC/lUJLKHWbbBZmn1xMIMWvLOjB/DlNupEucr9iSgu 8J4x1QqZA2PZDQwXfTcqaT0ruw1QYv/T8qO9W1P9BKCVd32horMMGTu6164hz+hMWj4AScg/cn9/D 2B1P/FvXu5TdtSmOarlNwQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Tim Ruffing on Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:00:17 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:294579 Archived-At: > From: Tim Ruffing > Cc: 73752@debbugs.gnu.org, Visuwesh , xuan@xlk.me > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:00:17 +0100 > > > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 19:46 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Did the "bad" display start from "good" at the beginning of a > > session? Or did it start from "bad" to begin with? > > I'm rather sure that it started bad from the beginning of the session > yesterday. > > In general, I'm not so sure, unfortunately. (I had disabled ligatures > in the past months because this bug was too annoying.) Don't rely on > any of this: I can't recall that it ever flipped suddenly from good to > bad *when the affected ligatures was in the visible array of the > buffer*. But I'm not so sure if this has really never flipped from good > to bad during a session, when the ligature was not visible. Then what exactly is the difference between the session with "good" display and the one with the "bad" display? How come they show the same ligature differently? What did you do to make them have different looks?