From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75292: 31.0.50; igc: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:28:54 +0200 Message-ID: <86cygy4e4p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pll5qexm.fsf@localhost> <86zfk9hxje.fsf@gnu.org> <87h66hqcqh.fsf@localhost> <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> <875xmxqa77.fsf@localhost> <86msg9hspa.fsf@gnu.org> <874j2h0wsa.fsf@localhost> <86cyh4j55c.fsf@gnu.org> <871pxjhjc1.fsf@localhost> <864j2fheva.fsf@gnu.org> <874j2efz19.fsf@localhost> <865xmud5jx.fsf@gnu.org> <87frlu34l5.fsf@localhost> <86ikqq4ioo.fsf@gnu.org> <8734hu31lu.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 07 20:30:20 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFHP-0000Po-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:30:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFHD-0006Cz-95; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:30:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFH9-000648-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFH9-0008ET-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:30:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=AF+EYhayAZCF+ztNFkAoz4e9DGzuk9N5rIkwyHkrZ1Y=; b=SgopaIt8dLlOWCguzpSPs+934khBTbN2rTjyIAXak9ys/G/8VQaCKoh0XXl5WR0khjOXh4OxB+UK4RzmqovL33Y5RfJMJ2JydEHpfQ37H1i5vqBjS8nfBpSeRqr/dbpKLTeOlPUCaa+6fW06FbZurxrPmL6Kyd0vvewfPQIzzHJHzCqiWAUb1VyRnniFgKA3lQ4w/Rmv7LBDbQx85Db561tQyQNxsosj7EXXzqHv0pMKqbAdvlqDwbEztH9i3VnuneJ1IzSJ8p2OeDcG9fRzl7lPQKuv6CRCYG7nE2WQIYuIvfcVdK3xMki1DANu3qwO9h5WkPos3xPZtZnfm3Slcw==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFH8-0001PS-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75292.17362781505295 (code B ref 75292); Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2025 19:29:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44726 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFGI-0001NJ-Cw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFGG-0001N1-5p for 75292@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVFG9-00084k-Pl; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:29:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=AF+EYhayAZCF+ztNFkAoz4e9DGzuk9N5rIkwyHkrZ1Y=; b=Zh4kULYYBkZw yyong69CBL1hbGsnN2r2m1dzI8LKe3HlMLuykSzffwVkDJ9fuhYgB2QkThapPoVXeRnZfbxde+b3v AA6otxOuMMlnsddQDYuZCOPadWkIic0qZBHIRO6Dc75otZe582247zSZsu10A9+/N/ZDI9Xcd73SK kyHNe+TMgUpA7TCjOjcs/SKO42y+IuzWvx5OVopTk2rlXAuETIHrB+ulkBRNJzS8M8YyNHmuYZbPV ONeNvHassfSfe2anZqLuHzW1fNnjpZWFlDZB8FlMQppr0Ih4K0P9tpmh4wWlRJSWuJOkdLnz03rvL O6wagmxBjx/7+kkcwZI0ig==; In-Reply-To: <8734hu31lu.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:44:45 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298745 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 75292@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:44:45 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I guess the next thing to try is to return to the posix_spawn build > > after callproc.c is patched as discussed in bug#75322. > > Do I understand correctly that the patch is not yet finalized? No. It was installed, but then reverted. The plan is to revert the revert, AFAIU.