From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:06:06 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86bl2ikail.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27376"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, Gregory Heytings , 51883@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 18:08:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPq-0006uA-Rp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 18:08:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPp-0006Zn-PT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPi-0006Wv-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPi-0004pi-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPi-0006xI-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.163716885726667 (code B ref 51883); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2021 17:07:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPI-0006w3-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:53311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOPE-0006vk-BI for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:07:35 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D084FF809; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:07:24 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:11:36 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220230 Archived-At: >> + (bindings--define-key menu [undelete-last-deleted-frame] >> + '(menu-item "Undelete Frame" undelete-frame >> + :enable undelete-frame-mode >> + :help "Undelete last deleted frame")) > > How about using "restore" instead of "undelete", here and everywhere > else? I think it's a tad more clear, and also easier to understand, > as it doesn't use negative tense. Michael pointed out that "restore" is a too confusing name where "restore" is opposite to making a frame fullscreen. OTOH, "undelete" is similar to "undo", so "undelete" better explains what it does. And the main advantage of the name "undelete-frame" is that it's immediately clear that it's opposite to "delete-frame".