From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60886: 29.0.60; split-root-window-below broken for split-window-keep-point Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:55:43 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86bkmnx1eo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86k01la7gn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r0vs0z44.fsf@gnu.org> <61dc9888-cb02-5323-f86f-23bdb19c5893@gmx.at> <865yd33dkf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <952857f0-ceca-9677-992b-9a1659130a0f@gmx.at> <83zgafyqvj.fsf@gnu.org> <0bc1444b-cb79-43e1-d363-5e40ad317fa0@gmx.at> <83pmbazvnn.fsf@gnu.org> <9703eeaf-42bf-aeb1-c03b-c3c8700aab48@gmx.at> <83a62epxo6.fsf@gnu.org> <3a9c38d8-ebf5-67d4-63de-a2d2acb127e6@gmx.at> <86v8kzg48b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7b40323a-2074-39ed-a73a-c8dbdc472e81@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 60886@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 24 19:00:42 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNb7-0000ND-Dh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:00:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNar-0001Ar-AU; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:00:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNak-000184-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNaU-0005eY-KQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNaU-0003Pf-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60886.167458316713052 (code B ref 60886); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2023 17:59:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNZv-0003OR-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:51431) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pKNZs-0003OC-CL for 60886@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:59:25 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13F4F1C0008; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:59:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <7b40323a-2074-39ed-a73a-c8dbdc472e81@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2023 10:53:49 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254060 Archived-At: >> I proposed the same in bug#56767. > > That would have avoided nonsense like retrieving 'window-point' of an > uninvolved window or the 'quit-restore' parameter of an internal window. Maybe if it's an internal window it should fall back to the selected window to get the 'quit-restore' parameter? OTOH, the new argument WINDOW-TO-SPLIT makes sense for split-window-below and split-window-right when it's not an internal window, to be able to split any non-selected window.