From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#69083: Emacs's keyboard hook state is not reset on session lock
 (Windows)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 08:41:36 +0200
Message-ID: <86bk7ysbbz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <yplmeddhpj9t.fsf@mnet-mail.de> <86cyt1qvmt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <yplm34tupxua.fsf@mnet-mail.de> <861q9exmhe.fsf@gnu.org>
 <yplmbk8brl20.fsf@mnet-mail.de> <86v86im1r9.fsf@gnu.org>
 <yplmh6hv9bo0.fsf@mnet-mail.de> <868r36uzdh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <yplmy1b3nhqi.fsf@mnet-mail.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="4735"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: 69083@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Raffael Stocker <r.stocker@mnet-mail.de>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 01 07:44:57 2024
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rfwdc-0000zq-Ru
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:44:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rfwdN-0000Q4-OR; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:44:41 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rfwdI-0000Pl-3M
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:44:36 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rfwdG-0008Gw-Q3
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:44:35 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rfwdi-0007Il-2N
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:45:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 06:45:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69083.B69083.170927546728005@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69083
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
Original-Received: via spool by 69083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69083.170927546728005
 (code B ref 69083); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 06:45:02 +0000
Original-Received: (at 69083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2024 06:44:27 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rfwd8-0007Hd-LH
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:44:26 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43596)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rfwd5-0007HO-5W
 for 69083@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:44:25 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rfwaS-0007xJ-69; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 01:41:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=9iwTjd7Ajvmr0XFMzrWwSlOx8WiA6s4Qg1WNyhLc664=; b=gZqF7AOZlM26mOrbiOyH
 IQ2gfSXn3s8MLCkuTYRIp6i2TuAbsLp3xNpB+39e9yedvNRsOnTe1UswzbYltIIKmy9Ya1UtO4BFR
 UZ048SpePjL1X+j3G9BYSiE/H/7a9MUfKQ7ZC5jzEkdfhrprlDj6jZtZzTsKZIimz4WLn0TYb4LpN
 eHKlDx0/hVKcYgHYlvrPJph+LL20J/Vb1uEARZzCqjJ+r5cdm0LAwFSj3fSj2vpEstIy26amYxrEJ
 YH0Opysxiv+OWqne+5zqTdegnS44HKxDn3aOJQhzwxSniPUWwBbIp2nbMPd2OAwpEq1ttkc/skMZJ
 c0GJMBXaB5W8Ng==;
In-Reply-To: <yplmy1b3nhqi.fsf@mnet-mail.de> (message from Raffael Stocker on
 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:22:13 +0100)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
 the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280839
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/280839>

> From: Raffael Stocker <r.stocker@mnet-mail.de>
> Cc: 69083@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:22:13 +0100
> 
> I'll think about this a bit more, maybe I can come up with a nice
> solution that doesn't require keeping too much state just for the reset
> function.  I am thinking about registering the notification for the
> first created frame, and when that is deleted, i.e. receives the
> ‘WM_DESTROY’ message, "handing" it over to some other frame if there is
> one.

This sounds like the simplest approach to me.

> I don't know much about the internals of Emacs frame handling.
> Could ‘w32_frame_list_z_order’ be used (from the input thread) for
> something like that?  Or is there a better approach?

Why is the order important?  Can't you "hand" the registration to some
other frame, no matter which one?