From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 20:32:27 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86a5x2ospg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <8635574n10.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <868rema032.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r0se4bwf.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm7xkqsd.fsf@catern.com> <83jzy419bk.fsf@gnu.org> <874jourckv.fsf@catern.com> <83lei6mxa0.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn1jutxv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83zg6eby5t.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0qjzj22.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6rccz9c.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83v8fsw0r9.fsf@gnu.org> <86v8fruwur.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83352vwb6v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34381"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 62700@debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh@catern.com, Eli Zaretskii To: Spencer Baugh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 14 19:34:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UO0-0008h1-Kw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:34:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UNh-0003jX-6q; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UNe-0003jH-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UNe-0003nK-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UNd-0004zl-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62700 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62700-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62700.168676400119130 (code B ref 62700); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62700) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2023 17:33:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UMz-0004yU-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:41283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q9UMy-0004yB-69 for 62700@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:33:20 -0400 X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D603CE0005; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Spencer Baugh's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:59:19 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:263377 Archived-At: >>> I looked at the patch that should be pushed to master, and noticed >>> that probably it needs the same change that was applied in emacs-29. >>> Maybe Spencer could confirm what would be the right patch for master. >> >> Yes, Spencer, please take a look. > > Indeed it needs the same change. Here's the version of the patch that > should be pushed to master. Thanks, now pushed to master.