From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68235: 29.1.90; Switching tabs stops following process output in selected window Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:35:20 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86a5m1jg0g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <21dcf921-acc4-4f94-b383-8ad6d0a57c59@gmx.at> <86v87qpow0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4bc98faf-5ebe-4c22-8c9f-04755785fde5@gmx.at> <86wmrjl8m3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <39fe71c5-db40-49d1-b22b-37b52ed13865@gmx.at> <86jzn6yzae.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <021bb8c2-3f2d-4746-8f04-49f43cf57d16@gmx.at> <86il2mxmxd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3fe7e4b4-bc9a-4303-a87f-a360765c597f@gmx.at> <86le6wpok4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86msrbutsu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1305821a-6a0e-4cbc-82fb-bac229599c1b@gmx.at> <86sf0y2fg8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86il0rgh5a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86o7aiiiy8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 68235@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 20:04:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rucJ4-0005Eb-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:04:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rucIh-0008KI-1u; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rucIb-0008K1-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rucIa-0004WI-WB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rucIj-0001qg-KZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68235 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68235-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68235.17127721876490 (code B ref 68235); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 18:03:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rucHo-0001gH-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::227]:46177) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rucHj-0001dN-Fl for 68235@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6333C20002; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:02:42 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:47:23 +0200") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283056 Archived-At: >> Because 'find-alternate-file' renames >> the buffer with (rename-buffer " **lose**") before killing it. >> So 'kill-buffer' remembers the last buffer name " **lose**". > > But that's correct and reflects what the doc-string says. The problem > must be elsewhere. Basically, it seems to me that when we have a live > buffer whose name is " **lose**" and a killed buffer with the same last > name (or maybe two or more killed buffers with the same last name) we > have a conflict that we have to resolve somehow. Right? I don't > understand why we can't "prefer" the live buffer to the dead buffer > here. For dead buffers, the problem might be that of finding the right > one, in particular when they have different file names. What is worse is that 'find-alternate-file' also resets 'buffer-file-name' to nil before killing the " **lose**" buffer. So even can't use a file name.