From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alain Schneble Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22044: 24.4; url-expand.el and url-parse.el not conforming to RFC 3986 Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <868u4ho542.fsf@realize.ch> References: <86fuzpyen0.fsf@realize.ch> <86610ly9l0.fsf@realize.ch> <87twn6ti5x.fsf@gnus.org> <86ziwytb9g.fsf@realize.ch> <87y4ciup9b.fsf@gnus.org> <86k2o2nle0.fsf@realize.ch> <87wps2m6j1.fsf@gnus.org> <86fuyqnjl2.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451127146 12360 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 10:52:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 22044@debbugs.gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 11:52:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmSO-0006Bw-F0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:52:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38122 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmSI-0003ar-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:52:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmSF-0003aU-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmSA-0003Iw-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmS9-0003Ir-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmS9-0005Bb-Gr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alain Schneble Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22044.145112710519912 (code B ref 22044); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 10:51:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36811 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmRt-0005B6-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from clientmail.realize.ch ([46.140.89.53]:2022) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCmRr-0005Ar-M0 for 22044@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:51:44 -0500 Original-Received: from rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit ([192.168.0.105]) by clientmail.realize.ch ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:51:33 +0100 Original-Received: from MYNGB (192.168.66.64) by rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.516.32; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:51:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:03 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) X-ClientProxiedBy: rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) To rintintin.hq.realize.ch.lan.rit (192.168.0.105) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110599 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: >>>>>> Alain Schneble writes: > >> Thanks, great! I see nothing against backporting it to Emacs 25.1. But I >> must be honest, I'm pretty new to Emacs and its hard for me to judge the >> risks of doing so. > > At this point mainly ask yourself: > > 1. Would the change require new, or change existing, documentation or APIs? > If so, it should go to master. The bugfix does not change any public interface. And the documented behavior is expected to remain the same. > 2. If it corrects existing behavior, refines that behavior, or removes a > stumbling block, it should go to emacs-25. It clearly corrects existing behavior and adds a bunch of new test cases. From that point of view, it shoud go to emacs-25. > The length of time it takes to get emacs-25 fully ready should not be seen as > an opening for "features that could get ready during that time". I haven't > seen any attempts to commit such features, I just wanted to make this one > point clear. I see your point - thanks for clarifying this. But as stated above, I don't think it falls into this category of changes. Thanks! Alain