From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57400: 29.0.50; Support sending patches from VC directly Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 21:54:31 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <868rlhq7yo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <84v8qgn1z9.fsf@iki.fi> <87h71zo3p8.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfljmgwz.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1twvima.fsf@posteo.net> <84sfk2p846.fsf@iki.fi> <87h70i9ntt.fsf@posteo.net> <87edvl6vbj.fsf@gmail.com> <8735c1nn3y.fsf@posteo.net> <877d1d6rcy.fsf@gmail.com> <867d1cjc8w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o7unkggk.fsf@posteo.net> <86edvids93.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zge52nx0.fsf@posteo.net> <86sfjvqz68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a662fs2d.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17258"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Robert Pluim , 57400@debbugs.gnu.org, Antoine Kalmbach To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 21:21:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmii-0004JE-2V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 21:21:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmih-0000kq-6W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmiV-0000kT-BU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmiV-0003aK-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmiU-0002En-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 19:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57400.16658616618588 (code B ref 57400); Sat, 15 Oct 2022 19:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2022 19:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmiT-0002ER-E9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:46109) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ojmiO-0002Dt-SZ for 57400@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EFFF1BF205; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 19:20:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a662fs2d.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:44:26 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:245582 Archived-At: >> Hmm, I tried both variants, and still not sure which is better >> for the 1-patch case. However, what I definitely suggest to do is >> to get rid of recursive-edit, that also Robert noticed on emacs-devel. >> recursive-edit is too fragile for modal editing, because such >> commands as keyboard-escape-quit can easily break it. Without >> recursive-edit you can just create all mail buffers at once. >> Then after sending one mail, its buffer gets buried, and the >> next mail buffer will be shown instead, etc. > > I think you are right, I'll do that and push the changes. Thanks. I noticed there is still dangling exit-recursive-edit.