From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55986: 28.1; (setq repeat-keep-prefix t) breaks repeat-mode Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 22:58:49 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <867d1gvfuu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87tuhdijk3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y26ny56p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pmrfo67f.fsf@gnus.org> <86mtlk8aw6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfl5y5i9.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21165"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 51281@debbugs.gnu.org, 55986@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 22:58:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofSWV-0005LK-0p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 22:58:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60896 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofSWT-0004Sp-DA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofReZ-000453-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofReY-0008By-IL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofReY-0001yg-B3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 20:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55986 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 55986-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55986.16648273337522 (code B ref 55986); Mon, 03 Oct 2022 20:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55986) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2022 20:02:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofRdk-0001xD-Py for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:55989) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofRdi-0001wq-2Y; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 16:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7031C40005; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:02:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87sfl5y5i9.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 05 Sep 2022 21:40:14 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244334 Archived-At: >> I hesitate to make such massive change in repeat.el on the release branch. >> >> I have more patches for repeat.el that I'm unsure about to push. >> One of them is a patch that allows kbd syntax for 'repeat-exit-key': > > (I only skimmed these two bug reports lightly.) This was more than half > a year ago, but at least some of this hasn't been pushed yet? Are these > changes still on the planning change? One of the patches is pushed in b374952b51, but another change is more massive.