From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63455: 30.0.50; display-buffer-in-direction is always resizing Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 21:25:11 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <867csy6h2w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87fs82z7cw.fsf@web.de> <77edb1db-13ad-fa1d-d1fc-7a23f0b6240d@gmx.at> <86jzx6lvxz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86o7mgb4z2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86bkicckfl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ttw34w4l.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39704"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: martin rudalics , 63455@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 23 20:26:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q1WiE-000AAp-Vu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 20:26:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Whz-0005TU-8r; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Whv-0005Rf-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Whu-0003uK-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Wht-0006Uo-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 18:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63455 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63455-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63455.168486635324954 (code B ref 63455); Tue, 23 May 2023 18:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2023 18:25:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Whk-0006UQ-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:49291) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q1Whj-0006UD-6a for 63455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFB9660002; Tue, 23 May 2023 18:25:43 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87ttw34w4l.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 23 May 2023 04:30:50 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262249 Archived-At: >> Maybe a good name for the new function would be >> 'fit-window-to-temp-buffer'? > > Sorry to come up with this now, but: I think "temp-buffer" is a > misnomer here. AFAIU it is used for *Help* buffers. Those are not > more temporary than a lot of other buffers (doesn't the *Help* buffer > live more or less the whole session if you don't kill it?), and the way > Help buffers are displayed has not much or not only to do with how long > they live. > > I always found that naming confusing. It makes me think of > `with-temp-buffer', helper buffers, not of *Help*. Do you find the > naming appropriate, having the use cases in mind? According to (info "(emacs) Temporary Displays") maybe a better name would be "view-buffer" because it's intended for non-editable buffers.